Agricultural carbon credits as a pathway to the sustainable development goals
持続可能な開発目標への道としての農業炭素クレジット (AI 翻訳)
F C Cinthia, R Shalini, C Karthikeyan, R Premavathi, V Manivannan, S R Pangayar
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、系統的文献レビュー、計量書誌学分析、ADOフレームワークを統合し、農業炭素クレジットの研究動向と農家レベルの持続可能性への影響を検討した。2020年から2025年の159件の論文を分析し、年率61.05%の急成長、主要テーマ（土壌炭素管理、排出削減、炭素取引、気候レジリエント農業）を特定。参加による追加所得、土壌改善、気候レジリエンス向上などの便益を示す一方、高コスト、認識不足、測定の不確実性などの障壁を指摘。小規模農家の経済的実現可能性や公平な市場アクセスに関する研究ギャップを強調し、低コスト監視、安定した炭素価格、包括的な市場設計の政策を提言。
English
This study integrates a systematic literature review, bibliometric analysis, and the ADO framework to examine research trends and farmer-level sustainability impacts of agricultural carbon credits. Analyzing 159 articles (2020-2025), it finds rapid growth (61.05% annually) and key themes like soil carbon management and carbon trading. Benefits include additional income and improved soil quality, but barriers include high costs and measurement uncertainties. It highlights research gaps on smallholder feasibility and equity, recommending policies for low-cost monitoring, stable pricing, and inclusive market access.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、J-クレジット制度における農業分野の活用が進む中、本レビューは農家参加の促進要因と障壁を整理し、制度設計や普及策の示唆を提供する。特に、小規模農家の参加拡大や計測コスト低減は、日本の農業炭素クレジットの課題と直結する。
In the global GX context
Globally, agricultural carbon credits are gaining traction under voluntary carbon markets and compliance schemes. This review synthesizes evidence on farmer participation and outcomes, offering insights for designing inclusive and cost-effective programs aligned with SDGs and climate goals. It underscores the need for stable pricing and low-cost MRV, relevant to international carbon market mechanisms.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a structured overview of research trends and gaps in agricultural carbon credits, useful for identifying future research directions.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights barriers and enablers for farmer participation, informing the design of agricultural carbon credit programs and farmer engagement strategies.
🏛政策担当者:Offers evidence-based recommendations for policies promoting low-cost monitoring, stable carbon pricing, and inclusive market access in agriculture.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Agricultural carbon credits are emerging as a promising policy and market instrument for addressing climate change while supporting sustainable agricultural systems. This study offers a novel integrated synthesis by combining a systematic literature review, bibliometric analysis and the antecedents-decisions-outcomes (ADO) framework to examine both research trends and farmer-level sustainability impacts. A total of 159 peer-reviewed articles published between 2020 and 2025 were retrieved from the Scopus database using defined keywords related to carbon credits, carbon markets and agriculture and were selected based on PRISMA inclusion and exclusion criteria, restricting the analysis to English-language journal articles. Bibliometric tools such as VOS viewer and Biblioshiny were used to analyse publication patterns, research collaborations and thematic evolution. The results indicate a rapid annual growth rate of 61.05 % in publications, reflecting increasing global interest in integrating carbon sequestration with agricultural practices. Major research themes include soil carbon management, emissions reduction, carbon trading systems and climate-resilient farming approaches. The ADO framework, which links contextual drivers (antecedents) to farmer decisions and resulting economic, social and environmental outcomes, was applied to examine farmer participation and its impacts. Evidence shows that participation in carbon credit programmes can generate additional income, improve soil quality, enhance climate resilience and support environmental sustainability by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and promoting ecosystem conservation. However, adoption remains constrained by high implementation and verification costs, low farmer awareness, limited access to technology and uncertainties in carbon measurement and market stability. The study also identifies key research gaps, including long-term carbon storage, economic feasibility for smallholders and equitable access to carbon markets. The findings highlight the need for policies that promote low-cost monitoring systems, stable carbon pricing and inclusive market access, while future research should prioritise long-term empirical validation and equity-focused carbon market design.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.14744first seen 2026-08-16 05:01:04
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。