THE MARKET AS SOVEREIGN: CAPABILITY SOVEREIGNTY AND THE GLOBAL CONTEST OVER CONVERSION IN THE ENERGY TRANSITION
市場としての主権：能力主権とエネルギー転換をめぐる転換の世界的競争 (AI 翻訳)
Renato Moraes; Thiago Souza Serra; Dayane Aparecida Fanti Tangerino
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
資源豊富な国家が戦略的資源を発展の力に転換できるかどうかを「能力主権」概念で分析。中国・米国・ブラジルのデータを用いた指標（CSI）で、転換能力が開発の自律性を予測し、中国が米国を上回ることを示す。エネルギー転換の地政学と産業政策に示唆を与える。
English
This article introduces 'capability sovereignty' to explain why some resource-rich states convert endowments into developmental power. Using a four-component index (CSI) for China, US, and Brazil, it finds conversion capacity predicts autonomy, with China outperforming the US. Offers insights for energy transition geopolitics and industrial policy.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のGX政策（GX推進戦略、産業政策）において、資源転換能力と産業競争力の関係を考える上で示唆的。特に、日本の水素・アンモニア等の技術開発と資源外交の位置づけを再考する材料となる。
In the global GX context
Contributes to global debates on industrial policy and energy transition, offering a comparative framework for assessing state capacity. Relevant for policymakers and scholars examining how countries convert energy resources into strategic autonomy.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a novel index (CSI) for measuring state conversion capacity in energy transitions, useful for comparative political economy research.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the importance of institutional coordination and R&D intensity in converting energy endowments into industrial advantage, informing industrial policy design.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Why do some resource-rich states convert strategic endowments into developmental power while others remain trapped in extractive dependence? This article develops the concept of capability sovereignty—the institutional and infrastructural capacity to convert latent endowments into substantive freedoms on authored rather than rented terms—and renders it measurable as a four-component Capability Sovereignty Index (CSI), joining the developmental-state tradition, geoeconomics, and Sen’s capability approach. The CSI measures domestic value-added, value-chain position, R&D intensity, and institutional coherence for China, the United States, and Brazil from official and multilateral data. Resource abundance alone does not generate capability sovereignty; conversion capacity predicts developmental autonomy; industrial coordination predicts conversion. China outperforms the United States on conversion despite stronger American industrial-policy effort and innovation. The decisive twenty-first-century divide separates states that convert endowments into autonomy from those that rent it.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- Zenodo https://zenodo.org/records/21987144first seen 2026-08-18 04:12:26
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。