ASEAN共同体ビジョン2045採択後のASEAN製造業脱炭素化：比較政策分析
Manufacturing Decarbonisation in ASEAN after the Adoption of Community Vision 2045: A Comparative Policy Analysis (原題)
Mariyum Khanam, Mehedi Hasan
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
ASEAN共同体ビジョン2045とエネルギー協力行動計画を踏まえ、インドネシア・マレーシア・フィリピン・シンガポール・タイ・ベトナムの6カ国における製造業脱炭素政策の準備状況を比較分析した定性研究。各国の炭素税・排出量取引制度・炭素価格の実施段階を整理し、EUのCBAM対応が製品・排出原単位・モニタリング能力に依存すると指摘する。相互運用可能な測定・検証（MRV）や産業投資支援、分配に配慮した移行政策の重要性を示す。
English
A qualitative comparative policy analysis of manufacturing decarbonisation readiness across six ASEAN economies—Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Viet Nam—following the ASEAN Community Vision 2045. It maps implemented, pilot and proposed carbon-pricing instruments and assesses CBAM exposure, arguing that exposure depends on products, emissions intensity and monitoring capability rather than export shares alone. The study highlights interoperable MRV, credible industrial investment support and distribution-sensitive transition policy.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本企業のASEAN製造拠点にとって、各国炭素価格制度の実施段階とCBAM対応の実務差はScope 3・調達戦略に直結する。日系サプライチェーンのMRV整備や移行支援の検討材料となる。
In the global GX context
Adds granular, country-by-country evidence on how emerging Asian carbon-pricing instruments and CBAM exposure interact, complementing ISSB/TCFD disclosure debates with implementation-stage realities relevant to global supply-chain and transition-finance discussions.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:ASEAN炭素価格制度の実施段階を整理した比較枠組みとして、政策効果の定量研究の出発点になる。
🏢実務担当者:ASEAN拠点の炭素コスト・CBAMエクスポージャー評価とMRV整備の優先順位づけに使える。
🏛政策担当者:相互運用可能なMRVと産業投資支援、分配配慮の移行政策設計の論点を提供する。
📄 Abstract（原文）
The ASEAN Community Vision 2045 and the ASEAN Plan of Action for Energy Cooperation 2026-2030 place sustainability alongside regional economic integration, but the implications for manufacturing depend on national policy design and implementation. This qualitative comparative policy analysis examines policy readiness in six manufacturing-relevant ASEAN economies—Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Viet Nam—using regional frameworks, country-level carbon-pricing information, European Union Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) rules and relevant research available through 23 October 2026. The assessment distinguishes implemented, pilot and proposed measures and evaluates strategic ambition, institutional implementation and structural constraints. Singapore applies a carbon tax of S$45 per tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent in 2026-2027; Indonesia has a power-sector emissions trading system and a separate carbon exchange; Viet Nam has established a pilot emissions trading framework; Thailand embeds a carbon price in petroleum excise; and Malaysian and Philippine national proposals are at different development stages. The ASEAN Power Grid and conceptual cross-border renewable-energy certificate initiatives support regional cooperation, although these mechanisms do not, by themselves, establish manufacturing emissions reductions. Exposure to CBAM depends on products, emissions intensity and monitoring capabilities, and should not be equated with export shares alone. The findings point to the value of interoperable measurement and verification, credible industrial investment support, and distribution-sensitive transition policy. The study identifies institutional arrangements and policy options rather than estimating sector-wide emissions savings or causal policy effects.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.56557/ajefm/2026/v8i1424first seen 2026-11-10 05:13:05 · last seen 2026-11-14 05:22:38
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。