エネルギー・データが制度的現実となるとき：ブロックチェーンで保護されたデジタルツイン、認証、持続可能な都市インフラにおける説明責任
When Energy Data Becomes Institutional Reality: Blockchain-Secured Digital Twins, Certification, and Accountability in Sustainable Urban Infrastructure (原題)
Javad Vasheghani Farahani, Tan Gürpinar
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、ブロックチェーンで保護されたエネルギーデジタルツインが、単なるデータ検証を超えて制度的成果（再エネ証書、決済請求、コンプライアンス状態など）を自動的に構成する過程を説明する「自動構成モデル（ACM）」を提唱する。物理インフラから測定、暗号証明、ルール解釈・実行、制度的成果、正当性・説明責任に至る7層を定義し、下位層は認識論的、上位層は存在論的・規範的性質を持つと論じる。スマートコントラクトや認証ロジックが暗号証明済み記録を解釈して制度的アウトプットを生成する点を強調し、プラットフォーム設計者や規制当局を含む新たな説明責任の空白を指摘する。
English
This conceptual study proposes the Automated Constitution Model (ACM), explaining how blockchain-secured energy digital twins move beyond data verification to automatically constitute institutional outcomes such as renewable energy certificates, settlement claims, and compliance statuses. It defines seven layers—from physical infrastructure to legitimacy/accountability—where lower layers are epistemic and higher layers ontological and normative. The model highlights how smart contracts and certification logic interpret cryptographically attested records, and surfaces an accountability gap shared among platform designers, certifiers, and regulators.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
再エネ証書や非化石証書、トラッキング制度のデジタル化が進む日本では、ブロックチェーンとデジタルツインによる認証自動化は、SSBJや有報での再エネ調達・Scope2開示の信頼性向上に直結する。制度設計と説明責任の再配分は、GXリーグや排出量取引制度の運用設計にも示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
As global disclosure frameworks (ISSB, CSRD, SEC climate) demand verifiable energy data, this paper theorizes how blockchain-secured digital twins can automate certification and compliance, reshaping assurance and accountability. It contributes to disclosure-infrastructure scholarship by framing digital twins as institutional-constitution systems, relevant to renewable certificate markets and transition finance.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:ブロックチェーンとデジタルツインを制度構成の観点から捉える新たな理論枠組みを提供し、説明責任の再配分を分析する視点を与える。
🏢実務担当者:再エネ証書やコンプライアンス報告の自動化・信頼性向上に向けたデジタルツイン導入の制度的含意を理解する手がかりとなる。
🏛政策担当者:スマートコントラクトや認証ロジックが制度成果を自動生成する際の説明責任の空白を認識し、規制設計に反映すべき点を示唆する。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Sustainable urban infrastructure increasingly relies on blockchain-secured energy digital twins to improve energy-data verification, transparency, traceability, and trust across construction, operation, certification, and compliance. Yet the prevailing literature still treats these systems primarily as descriptive mirrors of physical infrastructure, emphasizing their ability to capture, verify, and protect data on energy production, consumption, storage, and exchange. Verified records can underpin institutional outcomes such as certification and compliance—but this framing ignores a deeper change: blockchain-secured digital twins may help automate the constitution of those outcomes, rather than only representing infrastructure performance. This conceptual study develops the Automated Constitution Model (ACM), which explains the conditions under which blockchain-secured energy digital-twin records transition from epistemic verification to institutionally recognized outcomes and how accountability is redistributed across the socio-technical actors involved in that transition. The model defines seven interconnected layers: physical infrastructure, measurement, digital representation, cryptographic attestation, rule interpretation and execution, institutional outcome, and legitimacy/accountability. Lower layers are epistemic—they measure, represent, and validate physical energy events. The shift occurs when encoded rule systems, such as smart contracts, certification logic, compliance frameworks, and market-governance protocols, interpret cryptographically attested records to generate recognized institutional outputs such as renewable energy certificates, settlement claims, compliance statuses, payment rights, and ownership records, rendering the higher layers ontological and normative. This study contributes to blockchain governance, digital twins, and sustainable infrastructure research by theorizing blockchain-secured digital twins as systems of automated institutional constitution rather than mere information-integrity tools. It also surfaces a growing accountability gap: as institutional outcomes increasingly rely on encoded rules, platform designers, data modelers, authors of smart contracts, certifiers, and regulators may share accountability with physical actors.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/su18179039first seen 2026-09-24 04:35:49
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。