分断された世界におけるエネルギー転換：グローバルサウスの再生可能エネルギー導入の政治経済を読み解く
Energy transitions in a fractured world: unpacking the political economy of renewable energy deployment in the Global South (原題)
Yanis Rihi
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論考は、グローバルサウスにおける再エネ導入が技術的対応にとどまらず、歴史的な従属・金融依存・生態的劣化を再生産しうると論じる。批判的鉱物の上流採掘ではなく、下流のインフラ実装過程（誰が決め、誰が受益し、誰が費用を負担するか）に焦点を移すことを主眼とする。グリーン水素の急増を典型例に、開発と空間的不公正を固定化する「グリーン植民地主義」的力学を批判し、権力・領域性・ガバナンス・金融・公正を横断する学際的研究課題を提示する。
English
This commentary argues that renewable energy deployment in the Global South often reproduces historical subordination, financial dependence and ecological degradation rather than being a purely technical fix. It shifts focus from upstream critical-mineral extraction to downstream infrastructure implementation—who decides, who benefits, who bears costs. Using green hydrogen as a key example, it critiques 'green colonialism' and proposes an interdisciplinary agenda spanning power, territoriality, governance, finance and justice.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本企業がグローバルサウスで再エネ・水素事業や国際パートナーシップを展開する際、現地の公正性・ガバナンス・社会的受容の観点を投資判断やサプライチェーン戦略に組み込む必要性を示唆する。
In the global GX context
Speaks to global debates on just transition and transition finance, cautioning that ISSB/CSRD-aligned disclosure and green-hydrogen investment narratives must account for distributive justice and governance asymmetries in host countries.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:グローバルサウスの再エネ・水素導入を権力・金融・公正の観点から分析する学際的枠組みの出発点となる。
🏢実務担当者:新興国での再エネ・水素事業の社会的リスクと現地ガバナンスを投資・調達判断に反映する視点を提供する。
🏛政策担当者:国際パートナーシップや水素政策を設計する際、公正性と受益・費用配分の政治性を考慮すべきことを示唆する。
📄 Abstract（原文）
As climate action intensifies, renewable energy deployment is increasingly framed as a predominantly technical response to decarbonisation. This commentary argues that, in the Global South, such deployment often reproduces historical patterns of subordination, financial dependence and ecological degradation. While extensive research has examined upstream extractive dynamics in critical mineral supply chains, far less attention has been paid to the downstream processes of infrastructure implementation: who decides, who benefits and who bears the costs. Our central contribution is to shift attention from extractive frontiers to renewable infrastructure itself as a site where global asymmetries and injustices are reproduced, negotiated and contested – singularly in contexts marked by energy precarity, asymmetrical governance and international partnerships structured by uneven power relations. The rapid rise of green hydrogen exemplifies these dynamics. Promoted as a win-win solution and a vector for sustainable development, it often entrenches extractive logics and spatial injustice. On this basis, the article makes a twofold call: to broaden energy transition studies by situating them in the lived realities of the Global South, and to rethink just energy transitions as contested political projects rather than as narrowly technocratic frameworks. It therefore outlines an interdisciplinary research agenda examining renewable energy development through the interconnected lenses of power, territoriality, governance, finance and justice, thereby laying the groundwork for an emerging field of research that critically confronts what recent literature terms ‘green colonialism’.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://hal.science/hal-05512535v1first seen 2026-11-14 04:41:27
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。