人新世の行き詰まり：実効性なき条約と惑星的ガバナンスの闘い
Stalemate in the Anthropocene: Ineffective treaties and the struggle for planetary governance (原題)
Benjamin Damoah, Sagini Keengwe, Eunice Ofori
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
1971〜2025年の主要な多国間環境条約を比較分析し、条約の密集が惑星状態の改善に結びついていない理由を解明する。実施・執行の欠落、制度の断片化、分配的・手続き的不正義という三つのパターンが相互に強化し合い、構造的に力不足のレジーム複合体を形成していると指摘する。条約の増殖ではなく、実施中心のCOP、公平な遵守メカニズム、レジーム間調整、資金・権利の正義志向改革への転換を提唱する。
English
This paper traces global environmental agreements from 1971 to 2025 and explains why a dense treaty architecture has failed to improve planetary conditions. Through comparative document analysis across climate, biodiversity, and pollution regimes, it identifies three reinforcing patterns: persistent implementation gaps, fragmented institutional mandates, and enduring distributive and procedural injustices. It argues for implementation-centered COPs, fair compliance mechanisms, inter-regime coordination, and justice-oriented finance reform.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本はSSBJ・有報開示やGX推進を通じ条約遵守の国内実装を担う立場にあり、条約の実施ギャップと報告義務の断片化という本稿の指摘は、国内開示制度の過剰負担や国際整合を考える上で示唆に富む。
In the global GX context
As ISSB/CSRD reporting obligations multiply, this paper's diagnosis of fragmented mandates and reporting burdens speaks directly to the global disclosure-infrastructure debate and to whether treaty compliance mechanisms can be made fairer and more effective.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:条約レジーム複合体の実効性を評価する枠組みとして、惑星境界と環境正義を統合した分析視角を提供する。
🏢実務担当者:報告義務の断片化が企業の開示負担にどう表れるかを理解する手がかりになる。
🏛政策担当者:条約増殖ではなく実施中心のCOPと公平な遵守メカニズムへの転換を促す政策的示唆を持つ。
📄 Abstract（原文）
This paper traces the evolution of global environmental agreements from 1971 to 2025 and explains why a dense treaty architecture has not delivered commensurate improvements in planetary conditions. Using qualitative comparative document analysis of major multilateral environmental agreements across climate, biodiversity, and pollution, the paper codes objectives, institutional designs, and observed performance. It integrates regime complex theory, planetary boundaries, and environmental justice to interpret recurrent weaknesses in this regime complex. The analysis identifies three consistent empirical patterns. First, implementation and enforcement gaps persist across issue areas, as global indicators for biodiversity, greenhouse gas emissions, and pollution-related mortality continue to diverge from agreed goals and targets. Second, states respond to the triple planetary crisis through a fragmented institutional landscape that multiplies mandates and reporting obligations while achieving limited coordination or policy integration. Third, distributive and procedural injustices endure because populations that contribute least to environmental degradation bear disproportionate harms and confront chronic shortfalls in finance, technology transfer, and voice in decision-making. These three patterns reinforce one another and create a structurally underpowered regime complex when evaluated against planetary boundaries and justice claims. The paper argues that incremental treaty proliferation cannot close these gaps. Instead, global environmental governance must shift toward implementation-centered Conferences of the Parties, stronger but fair compliance mechanisms, deliberate inter-regime coordination, and justice-oriented reforms in finance and rights. This diagnosis provides a foundation for future empirical evaluations of treaty impact and for normative debates on how to realize a safe and just operating space for humanity.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211464526001090/pdffirst seen 2026-11-12 06:04:12 · last seen 2026-11-14 06:09:40
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。