グリーン経済移行期における国際投資誘致メカニズムの改善
IMPROVING MECHANISMS FOR ATTRACTING INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT DURING THE TRANSITION TO A GREEN ECONOMY (原題)
Usmonov Davlatjon Sherzodjon o'g'li, Worldly Knowledge Publishing Centre
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
ウズベキスタンの太陽光発電3案件を比較し、競争入札・支払保証・長期契約・開発金融の組み合わせが国際投資をどう支えるかを分析。後続2案件の平均落札価格はナボイ基準を32.55%下回り、サマルカンド・ジザク案件はスポンサー出資1.93億ドルと開発銀行融資2.16億ドル、最大1,200万ドルの支払保証で構成された。競争価格・外資参加・リスク軽減の共存を示すが因果効果は未確立と明記し、案件準備から環境検証までを統合する投資メカニズム枠組みを提案する。
English
Comparative analysis of three Uzbek solar projects shows how competitive procurement, payment guarantees, long-term contracts and development finance combine to attract international investment. The two later projects cleared 32.55% below the Navoi benchmark, and the Samarkand–Jizzakh package paired USD 193m sponsor equity with USD 216m development-bank debt plus up to USD 12m in guarantees. The authors stress these are correlations, not causal effects, and propose an integrated framework spanning project preparation, transparent procurement, financial support, grid readiness and environmental verification.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
新興国での再エネ案件形成・保証・開発金融の組み合わせは、日本の商社・金融機関が関与する海外GXインフラ案件やトランジション・ファイナンスのリスク設計に示唆を与える。国内SSBJ開示とは直接の接点は薄い。
In the global GX context
Speaks directly to the global transition-finance agenda — blended finance, de-risking instruments and procurement design in emerging markets — and offers a replicable template for evaluating investment attraction via financial closure, fiscal exposure and verified environmental performance, relevant to MDB and export-credit-backed renewable deals.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:因果推論ではなく記述的比較に留まる点を踏まえ、保証・入札改革の効果検証手法として発展させられる。
🏢実務担当者:海外再エネ案件の入札設計・保証・資金調達構造を検討する際の実務的チェックリストとして使える。
🏛政策担当者:競争入札と支払保証の組み合わせが投資誘致と財政エクスポージャーに与える影響を制度設計に反映できる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
The transition to a green economy requires investment mechanisms that combine environmental objectives with commercially viable projects and credible institutions. This study examines how competitive procurement, payment guarantees, long-term contracts, and development finance can support international investment, using Uzbekistan’s solar energy sector as an empirical case. The research applies comparative project analysis to three solar projects, examines the disclosed financing structure of the Samarkand–Jizzakh investment package, and conducts an illustrative sensitivity analysis of financing costs. Calculations show that the average awarded electricity tariff for the two subsequent projects was 32.55% below the Navoi benchmark. The Samarkand–Jizzakh package combined USD 193 million in sponsor equity and USD 216 million in development-bank debt, alongside payment guarantees of up to USD 12 million. These findings document the coexistence of competitive tariffs, foreign participation, and coordinated risk mitigation; they do not establish a causal effect of guarantees or procurement reform. The article proposes an integrated investment mechanism linking project preparation, transparent procurement, targeted financial support, grid readiness, and environmental verification. Its principal contribution is a practical framework for evaluating investment attraction through financial closure, fiscal exposure, and verified environmental performance.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23659636first seen 2026-11-15 04:46:57
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。