This page provides an English interface to the gxceed GX paper corpus. The corpus aggregates papers from 14 contributing scholarly metadata sources and uses AI-assisted classification to identify signals related to measurement, policy narratives, outcomes, implementation, industrial adoption, and verification.
The goal is not only to discover papers, but to observe how GX research is distributed across research substance, implementation narratives, external expectations, implementation substance, and judgment formation.
Summaries are AI-assisted. Always refer to the original paper for authoritative conclusions.
Showing 61–80 of 4285 papers
de Stefano C.
A legal analysis reading the EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) through the lens of international law. It likely examines compatibility with WTO rules and climate treaties, and the legal legitimacy of border carbon adjustments. …
Anbumozhi V.
This paper examines how rising tariff uncertainty shapes supply chain decarbonisation strategies across Asia. It frames the tension between trade policy volatility and climate imperatives, offering strategic guidance for firms and policymak…
Kružić K.
A comparative review of emissions trading schemes (ETS) in Canada, the USA, Kazakhstan, China and New Zealand, examining their actual impact on emission reductions. It highlights how design and price levels shape effectiveness, offering les…
Pérez E.M.
This work examines how environmental compliance is framed and disclosed under the EU's new sustainability reporting framework (CSRD/ESRS). It links regulatory compliance obligations to corporate disclosure duties, highlighting practical cha…
Gadinis S.
This paper examines how the ISSB emerged as the central global setter of sustainability disclosure standards, moving beyond the EU's 'Brussels Effect' regulatory model. It analyzes the political economy of IFRS Foundation-led standard-setti…
P. R. Wright, Чарльс Дж. Миллер, K. McLellan
This paper maps Australia's evolving Commonwealth and state GHG framework for the oil and gas sector, from NGER reporting to the strengthened Safeguard Mechanism, mandatory climate-related financial disclosures, and environmental approvals.…
Michal Rimeš, Denisa Ihnatišinová, Juraj Válek +1
This article asks whether a carbon-tax benchmark calibrated on EU ETS data can complement emissions trading in Slovakia. Using 2015–2024 installation-level data on allowances, verified emissions and EUA prices, it develops an illustrative c…
Περσεφώνη Σταθοπούλου
Empirical mapping of the first CSRD/ESRS reporting wave using a 2,109-report European dataset (SRN) plus content analysis of 30 reports. Reporting is geographically and sectorally concentrated (Germany, France; financials), averaging 113.4 …
Hugo A. Macías, Carlos Andrés Pereira
This study analyzes the professional backgrounds, affiliations, and geographic origins of the 25 members of the IASB and ISSB. The IASB draws mainly from accounting, auditing, and regulation, while the ISSB brings broader sustainability, ES…
Natanael Bolson, Alexandra Rosioru, Marie Wells +1
This paper proposes a decision-oriented carbon accounting framework to bridge the fragmentation between corporate reporting and product-level assessment in manufacturing. Analysing UK and EU regulatory landscapes, it identifies structural m…
Gbenga Adamolekun
Using a global firm sample, this study finds carbon offsetting is positively associated with corporate carbon emissions, suggesting offsets may crowd out actual abatement. The effect is stronger for Asian firms and mitigated in North Americ…
Songsrirote, Nitiphong
An empirical panel study examining how explicit carbon pricing affects CO₂ emissions, distinguishing adoption, policy intensity (price level), and institutional capacity. It suggests that carbon pricing's abatement effect depends on stringe…
Lt Col Prabhat K Prasad(Retd), Manish Gangil
This paper comparatively examines how developed economies integrate industrial carbon management (CCS, CDR) into emissions trading schemes. It analyzes five regulatory dimensions, including treatment of CCS/CDR within ETS frameworks and all…
Hamna Bashir, Muhammad Junaid Nazir, Longfei Liu +3
This chapter argues that a new paradigm, Carbon Offsets 2.0, is emerging to restore integrity after trust crises over additionality, permanence, and transparency. It rests on three pillars: trust via science-based standards (Core Carbon Pri…
Aleksandra Stanek-Kowalczyk, Monika Zajkowska
This chapter traces the evolution of the EU sustainable finance framework from the 2018 Action Plan to the 2021 Strategy for Financing the Transition, assessing its role in mobilizing capital for a sustainable economy. It examines the syste…
Luh Luh Lan
This paper explains why maturing sustainability reporting has expanded rather than resolved ambiguity over directors' ESG duties, via a 'disclosure-duty feedback loop'. Because company law regulates process not outcomes, mandatory reporting…
Pei-Xuan Wu
This paper proposes a Multi-Party Computation (MPC) framework integrated with permissioned blockchain to enable cross-border ESG data sharing while preserving corporate confidentiality and national data sovereignty. Using China's PBOC green…
Ed Esposito
Divergent materiality concepts across GRI, ESRS and IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards create a "materiality paradox" for reporters and assurance providers. The article compares impact, financial and double materiality, and examines h…
Casper Gavin, Alenka Temeljotov Salaj
A mixed-methods study of the Norwegian real estate sector's readiness for CSRD compliance, combining a scoping review with stakeholder interviews. Key barriers include weak sustainability knowledge, difficulty with Double Materiality Assess…
Philumena Bauer, Dorothea Greiling
This Perspective challenges the expectation that CSRD/ESRS standardization will resolve ambiguity in sustainability reporting. Drawing on an empirical study of Austrian state-owned hospitals, it argues that double materiality assessments do…
Browse by Topic