自然基盤ソリューションとしての沿岸植生：生態系サービスと海岸保護に関する書誌分析および代理指標マトリクスレビュー
Coastal Vegetation as Nature-Based Solutions: A Bibliometric and Proxy Matrix Review of Ecosystem Services and Coastal Protection (原題)
Mili Kwon, Seoyeon Kim, Gwon-Soo Bahn
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
1995年から2026年3月までのWeb of Science英語論文643件を対象に、VOSviewerとCiteSpaceによる書誌分析とメタデータに基づく代理指標マトリクス分析を組み合わせた。沿岸植生の研究は生態保全、物理的保護・災害軽減、気候変動適応の3軸に集約され、物理・工学系指標は侵食制御に、生態系指標は遺伝的多様性や生息地に偏る傾向が示された。社会・文化指標の可視性は低く、多次元統合評価の枠組み構築が今後の課題とされる。
English
A bibliometric and proxy-matrix review of 643 Web of Science articles (1995–2026) on coastal vegetation as Nature-based Solutions. Research clusters around ecological conservation, physical protection/disaster mitigation, and climate adaptation, with physical/engineering proxies tied to erosion control and ecological proxies to habitat and genetic diversity. Social/cultural proxies remain underrepresented, highlighting the need for integrated multifunctional assessments.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本は長い海岸線と沿岸防災・ブルーカーボン政策の接点を持ち、NbSの根拠整備は適応計画や生物多様性保全に資する。ただし本論文は書誌分析が中心で、SSBJや有報開示への直接的な示唆は限定的である。
In the global GX context
As ISSB/CSRD push nature and biodiversity disclosure, this review maps the evidence base for coastal NbS but stops short of the quantitative metrics disclosure frameworks need. It is most useful for framing nature-related risk and adaptation narratives rather than for direct TCFD/ISSB reporting.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:沿岸NbS研究の代理指標の偏りと統合評価の空白を整理した出発点として有用。
🏢実務担当者:沿岸インフラや自然資本の適応策検討時に、根拠の種類と限界を把握する参考になる。
🏛政策担当者:沿岸防災・適応政策でNbSを根拠づける際、社会・文化面の評価不足を補う必要性を示す。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Climate change and coastal development are intensifying coastal hazards and increasing the need for evidence-based Nature-based Solutions (NbSs) in integrated coastal zone management. However, proxy-based evidence for evaluating the ecosystem services and coastal protection functions of coastal vegetation has not been systematically synthesized across these dimensions. This study combined bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer and CiteSpace with metadata-based proxy matrix analysis of 643 English-language Web of Science articles published between 1995 and March 2026. The analysis identified three main research axes: ecological conservation, physical protection and disaster mitigation, and climate change adaptation. Proxy use was clearly differentiated across these axes. Physical/engineering proxies were mainly associated with extreme event regulation and erosion control, whereas ecological proxies were concentrated on genetic diversity, habitat, and life-cycle functions. Climate/adaptation proxies were distributed across several ecosystem service types, whereas social/cultural proxies showed relatively low visibility. These patterns indicate substantial evidence for individual protective and ecological functions, while cross-domain representation of physical, ecological, climate-related, and social/cultural dimensions was comparatively limited within the analyzed corpus. The proxy matrix provides a descriptive framework for organizing proxy-use patterns and identifying directions for developing integrated assessments of multifunctional coastal NbSs.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/su181910223first seen 2026-10-10 05:11:41
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。