集約化と低炭素性能:中国268都市の都市建設用地利用効率を評価する二段階フレームワーク
Intensification and Low-Carbon Performance: A Two-Stage Framework for Evaluating Urban Construction Land Use Efficiency Across 268 Chinese Cities (原題)
Xiaolu Huang, Ya Wu, Yu Zhang, Tingyi Liu
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
中国268都市を2001〜2021年にわたり、集約化と低炭素性能の二軸で評価する二段階super-SBM手法を提示。集約化効率は低水準で変動し、低炭素効率はU字型を描き、いずれも東部が優位。268都市中146都市(54.48%)が低-低モードに留まり、高-高は53都市(19.78%)のみ。人口規模の大きい都市ほど持続可能性が高いことを示す。
English
A two-stage super-SBM framework evaluates urban construction land use efficiency across 268 Chinese cities (2001-2021) along intensification and low-carbon dimensions. Intensification efficiency stays low and fluctuates, while low-carbon efficiency follows a U-shape, with the eastern region leading both. 146 cities (54.48%) fall in a Low-Low mode versus only 53 (19.78%) in High-High; larger-population cities show stronger sustainability.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
都市計画・土地利用規制と炭素削減の両立を測る指標設計は、日本のコンパクトシティ政策や自治体の脱炭素計画策定の参考になる。ただし開示制度や企業実務との直接接点は薄い。
In the global GX context
Offers a replicable efficiency framework linking land-use intensification to decarbonization, relevant to urban climate policy and city-level emissions accounting debates. It does not engage TCFD/ISSB disclosure infrastructure directly.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:二段階super-SBMによる集約化・低炭素の同時評価手法と地域間格差の実証は、都市効率研究の手法比較に有用。
🏛政策担当者:都市拡張と炭素削減を調整する差別化された土地利用政策の設計に、地域別効率データを活用できる。
📄 Abstract(原文)
Evaluating urban construction land use efficiency (UCLUE) from the dual perspectives of intensification and low-carbon performance is critical for sustainable urban development. Previous studies often assess this efficiency from a single perspective, failing to capture potential conflicts and synergies between economic density and emission reduction goals. This study adopts a two-stage super-SBM approach to evaluate UCLUE of 268 Chinese cities from 2001 to 2021, systematically examining both intensification and low-carbon dimensions. Results show that (1) the average efficiency from an intensification perspective remains relatively low and exhibits a fluctuating pattern of initial increase, subsequent decline, and final rebound, with the eastern region ranking highest, followed by the western and central regions. (2) The low-carbon efficiency follows a U-shaped trajectory over the study period, with the eastern region again performing best, followed by the western and central regions. (3) Many cities exhibit relatively low efficiency in both dimensions, with 146 of the 268 cities (54.48%) falling into the Low–Low development mode and only 53 cities (19.78%) achieving the High–High development mode. Furthermore, cities with larger population sizes demonstrate stronger sustainable performance. These findings provide empirical evidence for identifying spatial heterogeneities and formulating differentiated, context-specific land use policies to coordinate urban expansion and carbon reduction.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/land15112116first seen 2026-11-08 04:57:40 · last seen 2026-11-14 05:04:07
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。