Green industrial policy: a critical evaluation of State Aid for renewables
グリーン産業政策：再生可能エネルギーへの国家援助の批判的評価 (AI 翻訳)
Caroline Buts, Seppe Maes, Clara BOTREL LIMA, Songyue Li
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、EUにおける再生可能エネルギー支援のための国家援助制度の事後評価を体系的にレビュー。評価の方法論、実施上の課題、成功例と失敗例を整理し、今後のクリーンエネルギー政策の効率化に貢献する知見を提供する。
English
This paper systematically reviews ex-post evaluations of EU State aid schemes for renewable energy. It examines evaluation methodologies, common pitfalls, and best practices, offering insights for designing more effective clean energy policies.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でも再エネ支援策（FIT/FIP）の効果検証が進む中、EUの制度評価手法は参考になる。特にインセンティブ効果や比例性の分析枠組みは、日本のエネルギー政策評価に応用可能。
In the global GX context
As the EU refines its State aid evaluation for renewables, this paper provides a methodological framework applicable globally. It highlights how to assess incentive effects and proportionality, relevant for any government designing green subsidies.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:A comprehensive review of evaluation practices for renewable energy subsidies, offering methodological insights for policy evaluation studies.
🏢実務担当者:Governments and agencies can use the best practices and pitfalls identified to improve their own aid scheme evaluations.
🏛政策担当者:Useful for designing and assessing state aid for renewables, emphasizing evidence-based policy cycles.
📄 抄録（日本語訳）
国家援助措施的评价不仅是促进政策闭环的良好实践，而且自国家援助现代化倡议以来，对大型援助计划进行评价已成为强制性要求。评价支持国家援助的一些关键原则：i) 验证激励效应或措施在多大程度上实现了在没有援助的情况下不会实现的项目，ii) 描绘相称性或为撬动所需私人资源水平所需的最低公共资金，以及 iii) 分析措施以最小扭曲方式实现政策目标的适当性。本文回顾了已开展并保存在委员会微观经济评价能力中心系统目录中的大型可再生能源计划的事后评价。在详细说明案例选择过程后，描述性分析概述了按能源类型、持续时间和评价方法分类的已评价可再生能源援助计划。此外，我们呈现了包含不同评价步骤的时间线，并指出了常见陷阱。最后，我们回顾了评价结果，并提出了支持向可再生能源转型的援助计划的主要启示和挑战。通过系统性地回顾这些事后评价，我们力求提供一份全面的良好实践清单以及应避免的行为，从而为支持能源转型的更有效的“清洁”政策做出贡献。
AI 翻訳（deepseek-v4-flash）。 正確を期す場合は下の原文を参照してください。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Evaluating State aid measures is not only good practice contributing to the closed policy cycle, but it has also become a mandatory exercise for large aid schemes following the State Aid Modernisation initiative. Evaluations support some of the key State aid principles: i) verify incentive effect or to what extent the measure realises projects that would not materialise in the absence of the aid, ii) map proportionality or the minimum public funding needed to leverage the level of required private resources, and iii) analyse the appropriateness of the measure to achieve the policy objectives in the least distortive way. This Article reviews the ex-post evaluations of large schemes for renewables that have been carried out and are kept in the systematic catalogue of the Commissionʼs Competence Centre on Microeconomic Evaluation. After detailing the case selection process, a descriptive analysis outlines the renewables aid schemes that have been evaluated per energy type, duration and evaluation methods. In addition, we present a timeline with the diverse evaluation steps and point to common pitfalls. Finally, we review the results of the evaluations and present the main takeaways and challenges for aid schemes supporting the transition to renewable energy. By systematically reviewing these ex-post evaluations, we aspire to present a comprehensive list of good practices as well as actions to avoid and as such to contribute to more efficient ʼcleanʼ policies in support of the energy transition.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://journals.knute.edu.ua/scientia-fructuosa/article/download/2422/2453first seen 2026-05-15 20:14:28 · last seen 2026-08-08 05:26:21
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。