Break-Even Carbon Pricing for Sustainable Carbon Capture and Utilization at Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Facilities: A Life-Cycle Environmental and Economic Assessment Under 2024 and 2050 Scenarios
都市ごみ焼却施設における持続可能な炭素回収・利用のための損益分岐炭素価格:2024年および2050年シナリオ下でのライフサイクル環境・経済評価 (AI 翻訳)
Tianjiao Cheng, Hiroshi Onoda
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、日本の都市ごみ焼却施設(300t/日)を対象に、メタネーションとメタノール合成の2つのCCU経路について、ライフサイクルCO2排出量と割引年価コストを統合した損益分岐炭素価格を算定。2024年から2050年にかけて必要炭素価格が大幅に低下し、水素価格の低下が主要因であることを示した。CCU導入の経済的・環境的持続可能性を評価する枠組みを提供。
English
This study develops a break-even carbon pricing framework integrating life-cycle CO2 emissions and discounted annualized costs for two CCU routes (methanation and methanol synthesis) at a Japanese MSW incineration facility. Under 2024 and 2050 scenarios, required carbon prices drop dramatically, driven mainly by hydrogen price declines, making CCU viable with modest carbon pricing and subsidies. Provides a robust framework for assessing CCU sustainability in the waste sector.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の廃棄物発電は脱炭素戦略に組み込まれるが、プラスチック由来CO2が課題。本研究成果は、SSBJ開示やカーボンプライシング導入議論において、廃棄物セクターのCCU投資判断に定量的根拠を提供し、水素政策との連携の重要性を示す。
In the global GX context
Globally, this paper bridges CCU technology economics and carbon pricing instruments, offering a replicable framework for assessing CCU in waste-to-energy systems. It highlights hydrogen supply policy as a key lever, relevant to ISSB-aligned disclosure and transition finance decisions in the waste sector.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a methodological framework linking life-cycle assessment and carbon pricing for CCU, with sensitivity analysis that can inform future research.
🏢実務担当者:Offers break-even carbon prices and subsidy thresholds to guide investment decisions in CCU at incineration facilities.
🏛政策担当者:Demonstrates that hydrogen policy, not just carbon pricing, is critical for enabling CCU in waste management, informing policy design.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Municipal solid waste (MSW) incineration with energy recovery is embedded in national decarbonization strategies but emits fossil CO2 from plastic-derived combustion, challenging the long-term sustainability of waste-to-energy systems. Carbon capture and utilization (CCU) offers a potential mitigation route, yet assessments rarely link technology economics, environmental performance, and the carbon-pricing instruments that would finance deployment. This study develops a break-even carbon-pricing framework integrating life-cycle CO2 emissions (LCCO2) and discounted annualized life-cycle cost (LCC; capital-recovery-factor annualization at a 4% real discount rate) for two CCU routes—methanation and methanol synthesis—applied to a 300 t/day Japanese incineration facility (84,000 t/y) under 2024 and 2050 energy-system conditions, thereby quantifying the environmental and the economic dimensions of sustainable CCU deployment in the waste sector. Two complementary indicators are distinguished: an incremental break-even carbon price, the price at which adding CCU to the existing waste-to-energy facility becomes economically neutral, and a plant-level cash balance price. Under the product-system boundary and photovoltaic-electrolysis hydrogen, both routes show lower life-cycle emissions than the baseline in both years; the magnitude—and, for methanation in 2024, the sign—of the net climate benefit depends on the downstream-use accounting boundary. The incremental break-even price for methanol falls from 20.3 × 104 JPY/t-CO2 (≈1293 USD/t-CO2) in 2024 to 1.90 × 104 JPY/t-CO2 (≈122 USD/t-CO2) in 2050, while that for methanation falls from 32.2 × 104 JPY/t-CO2 to 0.75 × 104 JPY/t-CO2 (≈48 USD/t-CO2)—about half the 2023 EU ETS average price—and approaches zero at approximately a one-third capital subsidy. This collapse is driven largely by the assumed hydrogen-price decline (100 → 20 JPY/Nm3); hydrogen-supply policy, rather than carbon pricing alone, therefore appears to be the dominant lever for making CCU at MSW incineration a viable contribution to sustainable, carbon-neutral waste management. Sensitivity analyses covering the discount rate (2–8%), plant scale (300–900 t/day), methane leakage, product-market absorption, and hydrogen delivered price premiums support the robustness of this sequencing conclusion.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/su18168283first seen 2026-08-14 05:03:48
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。