グローバルな「公正なエネルギー移行」はどれほど公正か？グローバルサウスの視点
How just is the global ‘just energy transition’? Perspectives from the Global SouthM THE GLOBAL SOUTH (原題)
Lelo Tshivhase
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文はPRISMA 2020に沿った系統的文献レビュー（採用14件）により、グローバルサウスにおける公正なエネルギー移行（JET）の実態を批判的に検討する。アフリカ・中南米・南アジアの事例から、資金・技術アクセス・政策枠組みの格差、歴史的不平等、地政学的力学、気候金融ギャップが移行を不均等にしていると指摘。情報アクセス改善、調整強化、投資・資金メカニズムの整備を提言する。
English
A PRISMA 2020 systematic review (14 studies) critically assesses whether the global just energy transition (JET) is truly just in the Global South. Drawing on African, Latin American, and South Asian cases, it shows how financing, technology access, and policy gaps—shaped by historical inequality and geopolitics—make the transition uneven. It recommends better information access, coordination, and targeted investment and funding mechanisms.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本企業の移行金融・サプライチェーン脱炭素がグローバルサウスの調達先や資源供給国と交差するため、JETの公正性は日本企業の移行戦略・人権・調達リスク管理に直結する。SSBJ開示でもサプライチェーンと社会影響の記述が問われ始めており、示唆は大きい。
In the global GX context
The paper speaks to the equity dimension increasingly embedded in global disclosure and transition-finance frameworks (ISSB, CSRD social reporting, TCFD-adjacent transition plans). It adds Global South empirical framing to a debate often dominated by OECD-centric transition finance, useful for investors assessing just-transition risk in emerging markets.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:公正な移行の南北格差に関する既存研究の整理として、気候金融・移行ガバナンス研究の出発点になる。
🏢実務担当者:グローバルサウスに調達・投資を持つ企業は、移行計画に社会・公正性リスクを組み込む必要性を再確認できる。
🏛政策担当者:気候金融のアクセス格差と調整不足がJETの実効性を損なう点を、開発援助・移行支援政策の設計に反映すべき。
📄 Abstract（原文）
The concept of a just energy transition (JET) aims to balance the urgent need for decarbonisation with social equity. However, the implementation of this transition remains deeply uneven, particularly in the Global South. Moreover, many developing countries face financial, infrastructural, and socio-economic barriers that make this transition challenging. This paper critically examines whether the global JET is truly just, highlighting key disparities in financing, technology access, and policy frameworks. Using case studies from Africa, Latin America, and South Asia, it explores how historical inequalities, geopolitical power dynamics, and climate finance gaps shape the transition. This study conducted a systematic literature review, following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, to critically analyse the current position of the JET in countries of the Global South. Following a systematic identification, screening and eligibility assessment process, 14 studies were considered appropriate for inclusion. The review found that while Global South nations have made progress towards a JET, an unjust transition persists and presents its own geopolitical landscape. It also revealed challenges that still need to be addressed, including optimising existing processes, addressing inequalities, and effectively utilising emerging technologies. The review recommends, among others, that access to information be improved, better coordination be fostered to scaffold the transition, and specific investment needs, gaps, and funding mechanisms for the transition to just energy in the Global South be addressed. The study will assist developing countries to benefit from the JET process and will contribute to the renewable energy transition body of knowledge.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3051/2026/v37i1a24572first seen 2026-10-09 04:42:36
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。