文化を超えた参加のエコロジー：エネルギーと気候変動に対する公的関与の国際比較
Ecologies of participation across cultures: Cross-national comparisons of public engagements with energy and climate change (原題)
Jason Chilvers, Phedeas Stephanides, Helen Pallett, Tom Hargreaves, Elliot Honeybun‐Arnolda, Danny Otto, Gisle Solbu, Marius Korsnes, Tomas Moe Skjølsvold
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は「参加のエコロジー」枠組みと比較事例分析を用い、2015〜2023年の英国・ノルウェー・ドイツにおけるエネルギー・気候変動への公的関与を比較した。各国の社会技術システムと共生成される多様な参加と、代表性（英）・公式政治過程と消費（諾）・利益団体の合意的対話（独）という文化的固有の「参加の作法」を実証的に示す。制度的枠組みを超える参加の越境循環と排除にも注目し、参加の質向上には安定性・多様性・相互連関・排除への応答が必要と論じる。
English
This paper compares public engagements with energy and climate change in the UK, Norway and Germany (2015-2023) using the ecologies of participation framework and comparative case analysis. It empirically identifies culturally specific 'participation-ways'—representativeness in the UK, formal political processes and consumption in Norway, and invited consensual dialogue among interest groups in Germany—co-produced with each country's sociotechnical system. It argues that improving participation quality requires attending to stabilities, diversities, interrelations and exclusions within participation systems.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では再エネ導入・原発再稼働・CCS適地選定などをめぐる地域合意形成や環境アセスメント、自治体の気候市民会議の設計に示唆を与える。SSBJ開示や有報のサステナビリティ情報においても、ステークホルダー・エンゲージメントの実効性を問う視点として参照価値がある。
In the global GX context
For global disclosure scholarship, this work informs how stakeholder engagement—increasingly required under CSRD, ISSB and TCFD-adjacent frameworks—actually functions across political cultures, cautioning against one-size-fits-all participation models. It adds comparative empirical grounding to debates on just transition governance and the social legitimacy of decarbonization pathways.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:参加を静的な一事例ではなく、社会技術システムと共生成される動的なエコロジーとして捉える比較分析枠組みを提供する。
🏢実務担当者:再エネ・インフラ立地や脱炭素事業におけるステークホルダー・エンゲージメント設計で、各国の『参加の作法』の違いを踏まえる必要性を示す。
🏛政策担当者:気候・エネルギー政策の合意形成や市民参加制度を設計する際、代表性・公式過程・利益団体対話の各国差と排除されがちな参加の存在を考慮すべき。
📄 Abstract（原文）
This paper compares ecologies of participation with energy and climate change in the UK, Norway and Germany. Given the limitations of mainstream approaches that view public participation as highly specific and occurring in discrete one-off processes linked to particular decision moments, new theories, studies and methods are emerging that view participations as diverse, constructed and interrelating in wider systems. While these novel approaches have been explored in specific local, national and institutional settings, we present one of the first international comparative studies of participation systems across cultures. We applied the ecologies of participation framework and comparative case analysis method to map stabilities and diversities of public engagement with energy and climate change occurring between 2015 and 2023 in the UK, Norway and Germany. Our analysis shows how diverse public engagements are co-produced with distinct sociotechnical systems in each country. We empirically identify culturally specific ‘participation-ways’ in each country - i.e. collectively held criteria through which societies determine good or credible forms of participation - which emphasise representativeness of ‘the public’ in the UK, formal political processes and consumption in Norway, and interest group representation through invited consensual ‘dialog’ in Germany. Around these closures and dominant forms of participation exist diverse, emerging and excluded public engagements that overflow institutional framings, and translocal circulations of participations within, between and beyond the three countries. These findings suggest that improving understandings and qualities of public participation depends on attending and responding to these stabilities, diversities, interrelations and exclusions in systems and ecologies of participation.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2026.104951first seen 2026-10-10 05:01:38
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。