グリーン移行の統治：気候政策と公正な移行の連関における統治品質の調整効果
Governing the green shift: the moderating role of governance quality in the climate policy and just transition nexus (原題)
Saheed Olanrewaju Issa, Usman Zanna, Somod Dapo Olohunlana, Olalekan Olaleye
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
46カ国・2011〜2022年のパネルデータを用い、気候政策の厳格さが公正な移行に与える影響と、統治品質の調整効果を検証した。PCSE推定の結果、政策厳格性と統治品質はいずれも公正な移行と正の関係にあり、統治品質が両者の関係を強めることが示された。炭素税・排出量取引の収益を労働者再訓練や地域再生、社会保護に振り向ける政策的含意を提示する。
English
Using a 46-country panel (2011–2022) with PCSE estimation, this study examines how climate policy stringency affects just transition and whether governance quality moderates this link. Both stringency and governance quality show positive associations with just transition, and governance quality strengthens the relationship. It argues carbon tax and ETS revenues should fund reskilling, community revitalization, and social protection.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではGX推進法やカーボンプライシング導入議論が進む中、炭素税・ETS収益の使途設計や移行期の労働・地域政策を考える上で参照価値がある。SSBJ開示とは直接接続しないが、公正な移行を巡る社会的受容性の議論に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
As ISSB/CSRD disclosure expands, this paper links climate policy stringency to social outcomes, informing the 'S' in ESG and just-transition finance debates. It offers cross-country evidence on why identical carbon policies yield different social results, relevant to transition finance and policy design.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:統治品質を制度的補完として位置づけ、気候政策と公正な移行の条件付き効果を実証した点が参考になる。
🏢実務担当者:炭素税・ETS収益の使途や移行期の社会リスク管理を自社の移行計画にどう織り込むかの示唆を得られる。
🏛政策担当者:気候政策の厳格化と公正な移行を両立させるには、補償・参加・説明責任の制度設計と収益配分が鍵となる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Purpose The transition to a net-zero economy is vital for global sustainability, but it could cause social problems if it is not managed carefully. This paper contributes to this pressing concern by examining how climate policy stringency affects just transition and whether governance quality shapes this relationship. Design/methodology/approach A panel data set of 46 countries covering the 2011–2022 period was used for the analysis. Panel-corrected standard errors (PCSE) estimation, which accounts for cross-sectional dependence, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation, was employed to test the hypotheses. The findings were further assessed through a series of robustness and additional analyses, including two-stage least squares (2SLS), alternative model specifications, disaggregated outcome measures and channel analysis. Findings The results indicate that climate policy stringency and governance quality have significant positive relationships with just transition. The result also shows that governance quality strengthens the positive relationship between climate policy stringency and just transition. Practical implications Policymakers should actively facilitate just transitions by designing policy frameworks that anticipate social impacts and integrate mechanisms for compensation, participation and accountability. In addition, proceeds from the carbon tax and emissions trading system should be channeled towards worker reskilling, community revitalization and social-protection plans. Originality/value This study advances the theoretical understanding of just transition by positioning governance quality as a key institutional condition that shapes whether climate policy stringency translates into just transition outcomes. By conceptualizing governance quality as an institutional complement, the study extends institutional complementarity theory and deepens existing knowledge by explaining why similar climate policies may generate different just transition outcomes across countries.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1108/jed-11-2025-0780first seen 2026-10-05 05:16:27
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。