スペインとトルコにおける水素エネルギー政策枠組みの比較評価：MCDM手法を用いた公共政策の視点
Comparative Evaluation of Hydrogen Energy Policy Frameworks in Spain and Türkiye: A Public Policy Perspective Using MCDM Methods (原題)
Hatun Korkmaz, Buğrahan Alabaş
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、EU加盟国スペインとEU候補国トルコの水素政策をSWOT–AHP–TOPSISの統合フレームワークで比較評価した。公開データの指標を用いた分析の結果、スペインがトルコより水素政策の総合性能で優位にあることが示された。経済競争力、規制支援、技術開発、インフラ能力が政策成果を左右する重要要因として特定されている。
English
This study comparatively evaluates hydrogen policies in Spain (EU member) and Türkiye (EU candidate) using an integrated SWOT–AHP–TOPSIS framework. Findings show Spain outperforms Türkiye in overall hydrogen policy performance, with economic competitiveness, regulatory support, technology, and infrastructure identified as key drivers.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本は水素基本戦略を掲げ、EU域内外の制度差が水素市場形成に与える影響を注視する立場にある。本論文はEU加盟国と候補国の政策ギャップを定量比較する手法を提示し、日本の水素政策設計や国際連携の参考になる。
In the global GX context
As hydrogen becomes central to national decarbonization strategies, this paper offers a replicable MCDM framework for benchmarking policy readiness across differing institutional contexts. It adds to global transition-policy scholarship by quantifying how EU integration shapes hydrogen market development versus candidate-country conditions.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:水素政策の比較評価にMCDMを適用する方法論的枠組みと、制度差が政策成果に与える影響の実証例を提供する。
🏢実務担当者:水素関連事業の展開先選定や、EU域内外での規制・市場環境の違いを理解するための参考情報となる。
🏛政策担当者:水素政策の強み・弱みを多基準で評価する手法と、EU加盟・候補国の制度差が政策実効性に及ぼす示唆を提供する。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Hydrogen is increasingly recognized as a key component of the low-carbon energy transition and has become an important element of national energy strategies worldwide. Despite the growing interest in hydrogen development, comparative evaluations of national hydrogen policy frameworks remain limited in the literature. This study provides a comparative assessment of hydrogen policies in Türkiye and Spain, two Mediterranean countries with significant renewable energy potential but different institutional contexts, as Spain is an EU member state while Türkiye is an EU candidate country. The comparison is analytically meaningful because, despite their similar renewable energy potential and geographical characteristics, Spain and Türkiye operate under different institutional and policy environments. Spain benefits from full integration into EU energy markets and funding mechanisms, whereas Türkiye faces different regulatory and market conditions as an EU candidate country. Examining these differences provides valuable insights into how institutional frameworks may influence hydrogen policy development and implementation. To achieve this objective, an integrated SWOT–AHP–TOPSIS framework was employed, combining qualitative policy assessment with quantitative multi-criteria decision-making analysis. The TOPSIS decision matrix was constructed using observable indicators and internationally recognized proxy variables obtained from publicly available datasets. The findings indicate that Spain demonstrates stronger overall hydrogen policy performance than Türkiye within the selected evaluation framework. The results also highlight the importance of economic competitiveness, regulatory support, technological development, and infrastructure capacity in shaping hydrogen policy outcomes. The study provides a comparative evaluation of hydrogen policy readiness through an integrated SWOT–AHP–TOPSIS framework and offers policy-relevant insights for countries pursuing hydrogen-based energy transitions.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14193082first seen 2026-09-27 04:46:06
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。