Robust delivery, fragile legitimacy: How beliefs-rooted value conflict shapes project outcomes over time in an energy transition project
堅牢な納品、脆弱な正当性：信念に根ざした価値対立がエネルギー転換プロジェクトの成果を時間とともにどう形作るか (AI 翻訳)
Parinaz Farid, Marina Bos-de Vos, Vedran Žerjav
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、ノルウェーのFosen Windプロジェクトを事例に、信念に根ざした価値対立がプロジェクトの成果に与える影響を分析する。評価レンズを用いて、対立が先送りされると段階を経て激化し、短期的な納品の堅牢性にもかかわらず長期的な正当性の脆弱性を生むことを示す。価値対立の本質を特定し対処することが、関係者への価値創造に重要であると結論付ける。
English
This study analyzes how beliefs-rooted value conflicts shape project outcomes, using Norway's Fosen Wind project as a case. Applying a valuation lens, it shows that deferred oppositions intensify across stages, producing long-term legitimacy fragility despite short-term delivery robustness. Identifying and addressing the true nature of value conflicts is key to creating value for stakeholders.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では洋上風力や陸上風力の導入が進む中、地域住民や漁業関係者との価値対立が社会的受容性の課題となっている。本論文の知見は、日本の再生可能エネルギー事業におけるステークホルダーエンゲージメントや合意形成プロセスの改善に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Globally, the paper contributes to understanding social acceptance and legitimacy in renewable energy projects, relevant to just transition debates and stakeholder engagement frameworks. It offers insights for policymakers and practitioners on managing value conflicts in energy infrastructure projects.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a temporal framework for analyzing value conflicts in energy projects, useful for social acceptance research.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights the need to address underlying value conflicts early to avoid long-term legitimacy issues in project development.
🏛政策担当者:Suggests that regulatory frameworks should facilitate early dialogue and conflict resolution to ensure sustainable energy transitions.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Although value co-creation is often considered as achieving planned project outcomes, the impact of conflicting values-as-beliefs on those outcomes remains underexplored. A beliefs-rooted value conflict occurs when project actors hold competing beliefs about what is right or desirable to do, such that realising one constrains or undermines the other. This paper explores how a beliefs-rooted value conflict manifests in project processes and shapes project outcomes using the Fosen Wind project – a contested wind energy project in Norway. Adopting a valuation lens, we trace how actors' evaluative stances produce divergent engagements and practices, constituting an ongoing conflict process that shapes short- and long-term outcomes. We find a specific temporal dynamic: beliefs-rooted oppositions repeatedly deferred rather than resolved intensify across project stages, producing long-term legitimacy fragility despite achieving short-term delivery robustness. Our study shows that identifying value-conflicts’ true nature and addressing them accordingly is key to creating value for involved actors.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2026.102900first seen 2026-08-09 05:05:21
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。