砂漠砂と表面改質廃ゴムを混入したコンクリートの力学性能および限定的な埋め込み炭素評価
Mechanical performance and limited embodied-carbon assessment of concrete incorporating desert sand and surface-modified waste rubber (原題)
Han Liu, Abdulaziz Alqurashi, Sheng-Hao Jin, Ruo-Xi Ma, Wei Li, Yong-Cheng Ji, Mugahed Amran, Abdulmajeed Abuhail
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
砂漠砂と表面改質廃ゴムを細骨材の一部代替として用いたゴム混入砂漠砂コンクリート(RDSC)を開発し、16配合で力学特性と埋め込み炭素を評価した。砂漠砂20〜40%置換で圧縮強度が向上し、適量の改質ゴムで曲げ強度が増加、R-DS20-10が最高曲げ強度を示した。エントロピー重み付きTOPSISではR-DS20-0が最高評価(Ci=0.918)となった。ただし配合間の埋め込み炭素差は最大約0.17%と小さく、本材料系の価値は河川砂保全と廃ゴム活用にあり、大幅な炭素削減ではない。
English
Rubberised desert sand concrete (RDSC) was developed using desert sand and surface-modified waste rubber as partial fine-aggregate replacements, with 16 mixes tested for mechanical properties and embodied carbon. Desert sand at 20-40% improved compressive strength, and modified rubber raised peak flexural strength (R-DS20-10 highest). Entropy-weighted TOPSIS ranked R-DS20-0 top (Ci=0.918). Embodied-carbon differences among mixes were minimal (max ~0.17%), so the value lies in conserving river sand and utilising waste rubber rather than substantial carbon reduction.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の建設業はScope 3上流(原材料調達)の排出把握と、統合報告書・有報でのサステナビリティ開示が進む。本論文はGB/T基準による原材料段階の埋め込み炭素算定手法を示し、国内の建設資材調達における炭素集約度評価やSSBJ対応の基礎資料として参考になる。ただし炭素削減効果は限定的で、資源循環(河川砂保全・廃タイヤ活用)の文脈で読むべき。
In the global GX context
This study contributes to the growing body of embodied-carbon accounting for construction materials, aligning with global efforts under TCFD/ISSB and CSRD to quantify upstream Scope 3 emissions. Its use of GB/T 51366-2019 for raw-material-stage carbon estimation offers a methodological reference for disclosure infrastructure. However, the negligible carbon variation across mixes underscores that material substitution alone may not deliver meaningful decarbonisation, a key caveat for transition-finance and green-building certification claims.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides empirical regression models and a TOPSIS framework for multi-criteria optimisation of low-carbon concrete mixes, though carbon benefits are marginal.
🏢実務担当者:Offers a quantitative basis for selecting RDSC mixes balancing mechanical performance and carbon intensity, useful for sustainable construction procurement.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for standards that distinguish resource-conservation benefits from actual carbon reduction in construction material policies.
📄 Abstract(原文)
The rapid depletion of natural river sand resources and the increasing accumulation of waste tyres have intensified the demand for sustainable alternative materials that can simultaneously reduce resource consumption and environmental burdens in the construction industry. Although desert sand and waste rubber have each attracted considerable research attention as alternative aggregates in concrete, their combined effects on the mechanical performance and environmental sustainability of cement-based composites remain insufficiently understood. In particular, the synergistic influence of desert sand and surface-modified rubber particles on mechanical properties and limited carbon emissions has not been fully elucidated. In this study, rubberised desert sand concrete (RDSC) was developed by simultaneously incorporating desert sand and surface-modified waste rubber as partial replacements for conventional fine aggregates. A total of 16 concrete mix proportions were designed, with desert sand replacement ratios ranging from 0% to 60% and modified rubber contents ranging from 0% to 15%. The mechanical properties of the prepared composites were evaluated through cubic compressive strength, axial compressive strength, flexural strength, and static elastic modulus tests. In addition, the embodied carbon contributions of each constituent material were estimated within the defined raw material stage in accordance with GB/T 51,366–2019, and empirical relationships between the mix proportion parameters and the measured mechanical responses were established. The results indicate that replacing natural river sand with 20%–40% desert sand can enhance the compressive strength, while an appropriate amount of surface-modified rubber can increase the measured peak flexural strength. The R-DS20-10 mixture achieved the highest measured peak flexural strength. Through entropy-weighted TOPSIS evaluation of three strength-normalised carbon intensity indicators, R-DS20-0 was found to rank highest within the defined decision matrix with Ci = 0.918, and maintained the top rank under equal-weight conditions. The selected empirical regression models all exhibited coefficients of determination higher than 0.85 within the investigated dataset and parameter ranges. The difference in embodied carbon among the mixtures was relatively small, with a maximum variation of approximately 0.17%. Therefore, the core value of this material system lies in its potential to conserve natural river sand and utilise waste rubber, rather than in achieving substantial carbon reduction. These findings provide a quantitative basis for selecting RDSC mixtures according to mechanical performance and carbon intensity priorities.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-71166-1_reference.pdffirst seen 2026-10-09 05:26:02 · last seen 2026-10-10 05:46:53
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。