Green Credit and Energy Poverty
グリーンクレジットとエネルギー貧困 (AI 翻訳)
Xinmin Wang
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
中国の省別パネルデータを用いて、グリーンクレジットがエネルギー貧困を緩和するメカニズムを実証分析。グリーン技術革新の促進、産業構造の高度化、都市農村間のエネルギーインフラ格差の是正を通じて効果を発揮するが、制度的摩擦や金融市場の構造により効果が減殺される可能性を示す。
English
Using provincial panel data from China, this study empirically analyzes how green credit alleviates energy poverty. It finds that green credit reduces energy poverty by promoting green technological innovation, upgrading industrial structure, and reducing urban-rural energy infrastructure disparities, but this effect is weakened by institutional friction and financial market structures.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、カーボンプライシングやトランジション・ファイナンスの議論が進む中、金融政策の社会的便益（エネルギー貧困対策）への影響は重要な視点。本研究成果は、日本の金融機関や政策立案者がグリーン金融の設計を検討する際に参考になる。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to the global discourse on climate finance by highlighting the social dimension of green credit, which is often overlooked in favor of carbon reduction. It offers insights for policymakers and financial institutions in designing green finance mechanisms that also address energy equity, relevant to the broader goals of a just transition.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides empirical evidence on the social co-benefits of green credit, useful for researchers studying climate finance and energy justice.
🏢実務担当者:Offers insights for financial institutions on how green credit design can impact energy poverty, relevant for developing inclusive green finance products.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the importance of considering social equity in green finance policies, informing the design of mechanisms that avoid unintended negative effects.
📄 Abstract（原文）
The role and mechanisms of green credit in alleviating energy poverty remain insufficiently understood in the context of advancing carbon peaking and carbon neutrality targets alongside energy equity. This study aims to uncover the underlying mechanisms through which green credit affects energy poverty and to examine its potential implementation paradox.. Based on provincial panel data from China, this study conducts an empirical test using a two-way fixed-effects model. The results show that green credit significantly reduces energy poverty by promoting green technological innovation, advancing industrial structure upgrading, and reducing disparities in urban-rural energy infrastructure. This mitigating effect is negatively moderated by institutional friction and the structural characteristics of financial markets, leading to the concentration of green credit resources in large-scale projects and thereby weakening their inclusiveness for energy-poor groups. Theoretically, by integrating the theories of appropriate technology, energy justice, and financial development, this paper constructs an analytical framework connecting green credit and energy poverty, addressing the lack of attention to the social benefit dimension in existing research. From a practical perspective, the findings provide empirical evidence and policy implications for optimizing green credit design and enhancing its effectiveness in alleviating energy poverty.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.56028/aemr.17.1.146.2026first seen 2026-08-16 05:07:23
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。