Public support for climate mitigation and adaptation policies across Europe
欧州における気候緩和・適応政策への公的支援 (AI 翻訳)
Mary Sanford, Žan Mlakar, E. Keith Smith, Thijs Bouman, johannes emmerling, Alessio Levis, Silvia Pianta, Goda Perlaviciute, Lea Stapper, Massimo Tavoni, Loïc Berger, Jeroen van den Bergh, Thomas Bernauer, Alessia Casamassima, Thomas Epper, Maria J. Montoya-Villalobos, Ivan Savin, Milan Ščasný, Uyanga Turmunkh, Iva Zvěřinová
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
9カ国27,910人を対象に、気候緩和と適応政策への公的支援の決定要因を比較。適応政策の方がやや支持され、適応は有効性認識、緩和はコスト顕在性と政治化が主な規定要因であることを示した。政策パッケージ設計への示唆を提供。
English
Using survey data from nine European countries (n=27,910), this study compares determinants of public support for climate mitigation vs. adaptation policies. Adaptation support is driven by perceived effectiveness, while mitigation support is driven by cost salience and politicization. Offers insights for designing socially feasible policy packages.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では緩和策中心の議論が多く、適応策への公的支援の規定要因を理解することは、今後の気候政策の社会的受容性を高める上で参考になる。特に、コスト負担と有効性認識のバランスが重要であることを示唆。
In the global GX context
This study provides comparative evidence on public support for mitigation vs. adaptation policies, relevant for global climate policy design. It highlights the need to address cost salience in mitigation policies and effectiveness perceptions in adaptation, informing international policy packages under frameworks like the Paris Agreement.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides comparative empirical evidence on determinants of public support for mitigation vs. adaptation, useful for climate policy research.
🏢実務担当者:Insights into public perceptions can inform corporate communication strategies for climate policies and sustainability initiatives.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the importance of cost communication and effectiveness framing in designing politically feasible climate policy packages.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Understanding the drivers of public support for climate policies is crucial for designing socially feasible policy packages. However, most large-scale public opinion surveys focus primarily on mitigation policies. Here, we combine two representative survey waves from nine European countries (n = 27,910) to directly compare determinants of public support for climate change mitigation versus adaptation measures. We find that respondents support both mitigation and adaptation as policy objectives, but support specific adaptation policies slightly more than specific mitigation measures. Moreover, support for the two is shaped by a different composition of individual characteristics and policy evaluations. While adaptation support is driven primarily by perceived effectiveness, mitigation support is mostly driven by cost salience and politicisation. Our results suggest a stark difference in how Europeans incorporate the costs and benefits of mitigation versus adaptation policies into their support, and suggest avenues for remedying this imbalance.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/cpwxt_v2first seen 2026-08-17 04:55:20
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。