← 論文一覧に戻る

化石という巨獣を痩せさせる:脱化石の資金調達、サプライチェーンから最終用途まで(化石炭素ノートブック 第9号)

Slimming the fossil mammoth: financing defossilisation, from supply chains to end uses (Fossil Carbon Notebooks, Notebook 9) (原題)

Portolano, Patrick

Zenodoプレプリント2026-11-07#CCUS経営インパクト: 資金調達対象セクター: power
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.24024911
原典: https://zenodo.org/records/24024911
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

2024年の化石由来排出36.15GtCO₂を5つの介入群に分解し、回避可能量と回収可能量を項目別に推計。3シナリオで年間回避8.9〜20.8Gt、回収11.5〜14.2Gt、中道シナリオは回避14.3Gt・回収14.2Gt。生産者に抽出炭素の地中返還責任を課す「地質純ゼロ協定」の下、顧客側の回避を生産者が共同融資する仕組みと3つのビジネスモデルを提示する。

English

This notebook breaks down 2024's 36.15 GtCO₂ of fossil emissions into five intervention families and models avoidable versus capturable tonnes item by item. Across three scenarios, avoidance ranges 8.9–20.8 Gt/yr and capture potential 11.5–14.2 Gt; the central scenario avoids 14.3 Gt and captures 14.2 Gt. Under a Geological Net Zero Pact making producers responsible for extracted carbon, it proposes producer co-financing of customer-side avoidance below the ~$60–150/t cost of geological return, plus three business models and a Pact Fund (~$110–115bn/yr).

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本はCCS法整備やGX推進、Scope3・カーボンプライシング議論が進む中、抽出者責任と共同融資の枠組みは国内のCCSビジネスモデルや責任分担設計の参考になる。

In the global GX context

Amid ISSB/CSRD and emerging carbon-removal and CCS disclosure, this offers a producer-responsibility financing architecture linking supply-chain avoidance to geological return—relevant to transition-finance and carbon-accounting debates.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:抽出者責任と回避/回収の費用比較を定量化した枠組みは、脱化石経路とCCS経済性研究の出発点になる。

🏢実務担当者:顧客側の排出回避を生産者が共同融資する発想は、Scope3削減とサプライチェーン脱炭素の資金設計に示唆を与える。

🏛政策担当者:抽出炭素への責任賦課と協定基金の設計は、カーボンプライシングやCCS制度設計の参照枠になる。

📄 Abstract(原文)

Slimming the fossil mammoth: financing defossilisation, from supply chains to end uses. Fossil Carbon Notebooks, Notebook 9. Working version 0.9 This notebook quantifies, item by item, what defossilising the economy requires, and shows how to finance it within the Geological Net Zero Pact. The pact aims to return to the subsurface, step by step, as much fossil carbon as is extracted. Producers and sellers of fossil carbon would be responsible for the carbon they extract and place on the market, including what they consume themselves. The notebook starts from 36.15 GtCO₂ of fossil emissions in 2024 (EDGAR) and divides them into five intervention families: distributed generation; transport; peaking plants; internal operations of the fossil fuel industries; power, heat and industry. For each item, a simple model separates the emissions that can be avoided from those that can be captured on the remaining flows. Across three scenarios, avoidance ranges from 8.9 to 20.8 GtCO₂ a year and the capture potential from 11.5 to 14.2 Gt. The central “balanced combination” scenario avoids 14.3 Gt and captures 14.2 Gt. The engine of the system: every tonne avoided at the customer’s site is carbon not extracted, for which the producer is no longer answerable and which it does not have to return to the subsurface. Within an appropriate framework, producers will therefore have an interest in co-financing any adaptation that avoids a tonne for less than the cost of a return, around $60–150 per tonne on the first capture and storage chains. The pact leads to three business models, aligned with the three carbon accounts of the founding article: Common infrastructure. A geological atlas, the characterisation of sequestration units and shared networks, financed by the Pact Fund: 110-115 billion dollars a year for an indicative levy of 3$/tCO₂ . The fossil obligation. It rises on a fixed timetable and is met by geological return or by co-financing customers’ energy transition. Removals. Durable storage of biogenic and atmospheric CO₂ in the same infrastructure, under separate accounting. Scaling up is the main challenge. Capture and storage capacity in operation today is 50–64 MtCO₂ a year, more than two hundred times below the central capture potential. The atlas and the characterisation of storage sites must therefore be financed early. Contents of this record: full and condensed versions, in French and English. Status: Working version 0.9, subject to revision; version 1.0 expected in December 2026. The document sets out a proposal and orders of magnitude, with no deployment timetable; it does not constitute investment advice. Related: GNZ Pact founding article, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24024055 · geologicalnetzero.org

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。