← 論文一覧に戻る

気候リスクに対する企業レジリエンスの促進要因としてのデジタル金融とグリーンファイナンス:企業発展への緩和効果の検証

Digital and Green Finance as Drivers of Enterprise Resilience to Climate Risk: Examining Their Mitigating Effects on Enterprise Development (原題)

Babar, Saba Mahmood, Sajjad Ali Ur Rehman

Journal of Business Insight and Innovation📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-09-26#気候金融Origin: CN経営インパクト: 資金調達対象セクター: cross_sector
DOI: 10.63544/jbii.v5i9.233
原典: https://insightfuljournals.com/index.php/JBII/article/download/233/391
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、気候関連の不確実性下でデジタル金融とグリーンファイナンスが企業レジリエンスと企業発展に与える影響を、300社への質問票調査(5段階リッカート)で定量分析した。両金融手法はいずれも企業レジリエンスを有意に高め、気候リスクが企業発展に与える負の影響を緩和することを示した。回帰モデルは企業発展の分散の55.9%を説明し、気候リスクと各金融の交互作用項も有意に正であった。

English

Using survey data from 300 firms, this study examines how digital finance and green finance affect enterprise resilience and development under climate uncertainty. Both significantly raise resilience (β=0.304 and 0.357) and moderate the negative climate-risk effect on development (interaction β=0.147 and 0.176), with the model explaining 55.9% of variance. It links financial innovation, sustainable finance and resilience.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本では気候リスク対応と資金調達(トランジション・ファイナンス、サステナブルファイナンス)の連携が政策課題であり、企業のレジリエンス強化における金融の役割を示す知見として、SSBJ開示や投資家対話の文脈で参考になる。ただしデータは中国企業中心で、日本企業への直接適用には留意が必要。

In the global GX context

Amid TCFD/ISSB-driven disclosure and transition-finance expansion, this paper adds evidence that green and digital finance build firm resilience and buffer climate risk, supporting the business-case narrative for sustainable finance. Its survey design and China-centric data limit generalizability to global disclosure regimes.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:気候リスク・企業レジリエンス・サステナブルファイナンスを結ぶ実証枠組みと調整効果の検証手法を提供する。

🏢実務担当者:グリーンファイナンスとデジタル金融の活用が気候リスク下での自社の事業継続力・発展に寄与しうる根拠として参考になる。

🏛政策担当者:気候リスク緩和に向け、グリーン金融・デジタル金融の普及促進策の政策的妥当性を裏付ける材料となる。

📄 Abstract(原文)

This study analysed the impact of digital finance and green finance on enterprise resilience and enterprise development in a climate-related uncertainty environment. The research method used in this study was quantitative. The research type adopted was design method and the data obtained were questionnaire-based data and five-point Likert scale data of 300 enterprises. Descriptive statistics, regression (Pearson correlation), and moderation analysis were used to analyse data. The results indicated that digital finance has significant positive influence on enterprise resilience (beta = 0.304, p < .001), and green finance also has significant positive effect on enterprise resilience (beta = 0.357, p < .001). A significant negative relationship existed between climate risk and enterprise development (β = -0.331, p < .001); enterprise resilience had a positive relationship with enterprise development (β = 0.408, p < .001). The regression model accounted for 55.9% of the variation in enterprise development (R² = .559). Moderation analysis results further showed that both the interaction between climate risk and digital finance (β = 0.147, p = .002) and the interaction between climate risk and green finance (β = 0.176, p < .001) were positive and significant. The results show that both digital finance and green finance can enhance the resilience of the enterprises and alleviate the negative effect of climate risk on enterprise development. The study brings together finance innovation, sustainable finance, resilience and enterprise development, thereby enriching the climate-finance literature. References Chen, M., Liu, S., & Gao, L. (2024). Digital finance, financial flexibility and corporate green innovation. Finance Research Letters, 70, 106313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106313 Chien, F., Zhang, Y., & Sadiq, M. (2025). Fintech innovation in green finance: A disruptive force or a complementary tool? International Review of Economics & Finance, 104, 104658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104658 Fang, X. (2026). Can digital finance mitigate corporate climate risk? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 69(7), 2271–2293. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2025.2494280 Feng, B., Wang, Y., & Tang, H. (2025). The impact of green finance policies on the enterprise export resilience—Empirical evidence from China’s manufacturing industry. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 37(1), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.70002 Han, L., & Zhang, Z. (2023). Impact of digital finance on enterprise green innovation: From the perspective of information asymmetry, consumer demand and factor market distortions. PLOS ONE, 18(12), e0295809. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295809 Li, N., & Zhou, Y. (2024). Can digital financial development promote corporate green technology innovation? International Review of Economics & Finance, 92, 1562–1582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.03.008 Liu, J., Jiang, Y., Gan, S., He, L., & Zhang, Q. (2022). Can digital finance promote corporate green innovation? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 35828–35840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18667-4 Ma, J., Gao, X., Gao, D., Dang, J., & Zhao, B. (2026). Digital finance, green development, and supply chain resilience: The moderating effects of climate risk. Applied Economics, 58(24), 4603–4619. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2025.2498102 Rahman, A. U., & Amjad, F. (2024). The role of green finance, infrastructure, and technological capabilities in enhancing competitiveness resilience of Pakistani manufacturing firms: A. 4289–4304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-024-02837-8 Rao, S., Pan, Y., He, J., & Shangguan, X. (2022). Digital finance and corporate green innovation: Quantity or quality? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 56772–56791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19785-9 Ren, H., Huang, J., & Ren, J. (2026). Digital finance and climate risk information disclosure. PLOS ONE, 21(1), e0340383. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0340383 Wang, M., Yu, X., Hong, X., & Yang, X. (2025). Can digital finance promote green innovation collaboration in enterprises? Global Finance Journal, 65, 101109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2025.101109 Wang, Q., Wang, S., Wang, C., & Hu, D. (2024). How digital finance impacts listed companies’ green innovation in China: A product market perspective. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31, 19856–19870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-32442-7 Wen, J., Hai, H., Li, L., Dou, J., & Tao, R. (2026). Digital finance as a catalyst for green innovation: Threshold effect of diminishing marginal returns. International Review of Financial Analysis, 110, 104840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104840 Wongsinhirun, N., Chatjuthamard, P., Denlertchaikul, N., Jiraporn, P., & Korphaibool, V. (2026). The role of green corporate finance in enhancing firm resilience to climate change. Journal of Economic Surveys, 40(3), 1723–1741. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.70070 Yang, J., & Hui, N. (2024). How digital finance affects the sustainability of corporate green innovation. Finance Research Letters, 63, 105314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105314 Yang, J., Wang, S., & Xu, L. (2025). Green finance innovation and corporate resilience: Evidence from China’s reform zones. Finance Research Letters, 81, 107488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107488 Zhang, H., & Wei, S. (2024). Green finance improves enterprises’ environmental, social and governance performance: A two-dimensional perspective based on external financing capability and internal technological innovation. PLOS ONE, 19(4), e0302198. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302198 Zhong, T., Ma, F., Sun, F., & Li, J. (2024). Can green finance reduce corporate carbon risk? Finance Research Letters, 63, 105234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105234 Zhu, H., & Li, X. (2024). Can green finance improve corporate ESG performance? Empirical evidence from Chinese A-share listed companies. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 32(4), 590–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2024.2371302

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。