← 論文一覧に戻る

脱炭素化と持続可能な開発の文脈におけるロシア連邦と中華人民共和国の石油・ガス企業間協力の戦略的方向性

Strategic Directions for Cooperation Between Oil and Gas Companies of the Russian Federation and the People's Republic of China in the Context of Decarbonization and Sustainable Development (原題)

Ilyinsky Alexander, Ushpik Ilya, Temurkaeva Sibilla

Green and Low-Carbon Economy📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-09-22#エネルギー転換対象セクター: power
DOI: 10.47852/bonviewglce62028970
原典: https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewglce62028970
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

世界の気候規制強化とエネルギー移行が石油・ガス部門の戦略環境を変える中、露中両国の企業間協力の方向性を検討した研究。メタン管理や随伴ガス利用、低炭素水素などの技術経路と両国の規制枠組みを定性分析し、資源貿易中心の関係から脱炭素技術・インフラ・規制整合を含むモデルへ移行しつつあると論じる。炭素規制が越境エネルギー投資を左右する点を強調する。

English

This study maps strategic directions for Russian and Chinese oil and gas firms navigating decarbonization. Pairing a qualitative review of both countries' regulatory frameworks with technological pathways—methane management, associated gas utilization, low-carbon hydrogen—it argues bilateral cooperation is shifting from a purely resource-based model toward one incorporating decarbonization technology, infrastructure, and regulatory alignment. Carbon regulation increasingly shapes cross-border energy investment.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本は露中エネルギー協力の直接当事者ではないが、炭素規制が越境エネルギー投資判断を左右する構図は、日本の資源調達・移行戦略やSSBJ開示における海外サプライチェーン評価に示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

Amid TCFD/ISSB-aligned disclosure and transition finance, this paper illustrates how diverging carbon regimes shape cross-border fossil-fuel investment—relevant to global debates on transition risk, methane abatement, and the geopolitics of decarbonization beyond EU/US-centric scholarship.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:脱炭素下での非欧米圏エネルギー協力と規制整合の実証的枠組みを提供する。

🏢実務担当者:越境エネルギー取引における炭素規制リスクと低炭素技術統合の検討材料になる。

🏛政策担当者:異なる炭素規制間の調整が二国間エネルギー投資に与える影響を把握する参考になる。

📄 Abstract（原文）

Climate regulation is intensifying worldwide, and the resulting energy transition is reshaping the strategic environment for the oil and gas sector. Russia and China are no exception: their bilateral energy relationship has rested for decades on fossil fuel trade, and decarbonization now presents both a structural challenge to that model and an opening for technological and industrial collaboration. This article maps the strategic directions available to Russian and Chinese oil and gas companies as they navigate low-carbon transformation and sustainable development agendas. Methodologically, the study pairs a qualitative reading of Russian and Chinese regulatory frameworks with a review of technological pathways for cutting greenhouse gas emissions in the oil and gas sector—methane management and associated petroleum gas utilization chief among them, alongside emerging routes such as non-equilibrium plasma processing and low-carbon hydrogen. Carbon regulation instruments receive particular attention for their growing role in shaping cross-border energy projects and investment decisions. What emerges is a sector in transition: Sino-Russian cooperation is edging away from a purely resource-based model toward one that also incorporates decarbonization technology, infrastructure, and regulatory alignment. Whether that shift succeeds will hinge on how well companies on both sides can work across differing regulatory regimes, fold low-carbon technologies into existing value chains, and structure joint projects that clear both an economic and an environmental bar. The paper's findings speak to the broader question of where bilateral energy cooperation is headed under global decarbonization pressure, with implications for long-term strategic planning.   Received: 31 December 2025 | Revised: 25 June 2026 | Accepted: 4 August 2026   Conflicts of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to this work.   Data Availability Statement The data supporting the findings of this study are publicly available in the reference list.   Author Contribution Statement Ilyinsky Alexander: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision. Ushpik Iliya: Conceptualization, Software, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Project administration. Temurkaeva Sibilla: Conceptualization, Software, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Visualization.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。