持続可能な航空に向けた技術評価:AeroMAPSを用いたシナリオベース分析
Assessing technologies towards sustainable aviation: a scenario-based analysis using AeroMAPS (原題)
Adham Sarhan, Pavlos Rompokos, Ioannis Roumeliotis, Pericles Pilidis
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文はAeroMAPSフレームワークを用い、商業航空の脱炭素経路を評価する。SAF・水素推進・電化を短中長距離別に検討し、単独では限界があることを示す。これらを組み合わせた統合シナリオが累積排出削減で最も優れることを明らかにし、ジェット燃料+オフセット案も比較した。
English
Using the AeroMAPS framework, this paper assesses decarbonization pathways for commercial aviation. SAF, hydrogen propulsion, and electrification are evaluated individually across short-, medium-, and long-range fleets, each showing distinct limits. A combined scenario achieves deeper cumulative emission cuts than any single pathway, with a Jet A1 plus offsets case also analyzed.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の航空セクターはICAOのCORSIAや国内GX政策と連動し、SAF導入・水素航空機開発が進行中。本論文は日本企業・政策担当者が脱炭素経路のトレードオフを理解する上で有用なシステムレベル参照を提供する。
In the global GX context
Global aviation decarbonization is central to ICAO's CORSIA and national net-zero strategies. This paper offers a system-level reference for comparing SAF, hydrogen, and electrification trade-offs, informing transition finance and policy design for aviation's net-zero pathway.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:航空脱炭素のシナリオ分析手法と技術間トレードオフの定量的枠組みを提供する。
🏢実務担当者:SAF・水素・電化の導入判断や投資計画における長期的制約と機会を理解するのに役立つ。
🏛政策担当者:航空セクターの脱炭素政策設計において、技術組み合わせとインフラ要件の検討に示唆を与える。
📄 Abstract(原文)
Radically reducing the carbon footprint of civil aviation by 2050 may not be possible via technological advancements on aircraft and propulsion system level alone, but with the combined effort of the integration of alternative fuels and carbon offsetting strategies. The paper examines potential decarbonisation pathways for commercial aviation through the application of the framework AeroMAPS. The suitability of sustainable aviation fuels (SAF), hydrogen propulsion and electrification in reducing long-term climate impacts across short-, medium- and long-range fleet groups is assessed. Each pathway is first evaluated individually to determine its fundamental feasibility. SAF provides practical near-term reductions due to its drop-in compatibility, although its long-term contribution is limited by feedstock constraints, production costs and continued non-CO 2 effects. Hydrogen propulsion offers greater long-term mitigation through the removal of soot and sulphur emissions, but requires clean hydrogen production, cryogenic storage and new aircraft architectures. Electrification shows a benefit in short-range operations, while remaining challenging for longer-range missions owing to battery energy limits. A combined scenario is subsequently proposed to integrate the strengths of the three approaches. This configuration achieves deeper cumulative emissions reductions than any single pathway alone. An additional Jet A1 plus offsets scenario is analysed to reflect an alternative strategy with lower near-term infrastructure demands. The findings provide a preliminary system level reference for understanding the trade-offs, constraints and progression of propulsion and fuel technologies relevant to aviation’s transition towards net-zero emissions.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/AC4FE27083FA3A381F0FC571DCC84164/S0001924026102322a.pdf/div-class-title-assessing-technologies-towards-sustainable-aviation-a-scenario-based-analysis-using-aeromaps-div.pdffirst seen 2026-09-27 05:05:07 · last seen 2026-09-29 05:16:34
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。