グリーン移行過程における地域コミュニティ開発の公共ガバナンスに関する概念的アプローチ
Conceptual Approaches to Public Governance of Local Community Development in the Process of Green Transition (原題)
N. Zakharchenko, Oleh Babii, Andrii Andreichenko, V. Dengub, I. Topalova, Maryna Kalyuzhna
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、ウクライナの戦後復興とEU統合を背景に、協働型ガバナンスと環境持続可能性を統合する「適応的グリーンガバナンス」概念を提示する。多主体調整、長期生態計画、財政説明責任を組み合わせ、コミュニティ規模や被戦影響に応じた機能構造スキームを提案。エストニア・ポーランド・ジョージアの比較事例を通じ、排出会計や生態系サービス保全を地域予見手法に埋め込む必要性を論じる。
English
This paper develops an 'adaptive green governance' framework integrating collaborative governance with environmental sustainability for Ukrainian territorial communities amid post-conflict reconstruction and EU integration. It proposes a functional-structural scheme for operationalizing green governance across communities of varying size and war-affected status, drawing on comparative evidence from Estonia, Poland, and Georgia. It argues that embedding ecological constraints—emissions accounting, ecosystem services, soil regeneration—into local foresight is essential for EU alignment.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本文脈への直接接点は薄いが、自治体レベルの脱炭素計画と住民参加・デジタル環境管理の統合は、日本の地方自治体GX戦略や地域脱炭素ロードマップの設計に示唆を与える。SSBJ・有報対応とは距離がある。
In the global GX context
While focused on Ukraine's post-conflict and EU-accession context, the paper speaks to global debates on subnational climate governance and the localization of European Green Deal instruments. It adds a governance-capacity lens often missing from disclosure-centric scholarship, relevant to how municipalities operationalize emissions accounting and ecological planning.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:サブナショナル・ガバナンスと環境計画の統合に関する概念枠組みと比較事例を提供する。
🏢実務担当者:自治体・地域レベルで脱炭素計画とステークホルダー参加を設計する際の構造的視点を与える。
🏛政策担当者:EU整合を見据えた地域環境ガバナンスの準備度評価ツールと制度設計の示唆を提供する。
📄 Abstract(原文)
The article explores the integration of collaborative governance frameworks with environmental sustainability objectives as a strategic imperative for local community development in Ukraine amid post-conflict reconstruction and European integration pressures. The theoretical and methodological foundations for merging participatory decision-making models, network-based institutional arrangements, and performance-oriented management principles within the specific context of Ukrainian territorial communities are systematically examined. The author's conceptualization of «adaptive green governance» is substantiated, a framework that synthesizes multi-stakeholder coordination mechanisms, long-term ecological planning horizons, and fiscal accountability tailored to the administrative capacities of amalgamated territorial communities. Key differentiations between conventional administrative planning and environmentally embedded governance models in the municipal sector are identified. A functional-structural scheme for operationalizing green governance principles across communities of varying sizes, resource endowments, and war-affected statuses is proposed. International comparative evidence from Estonia's digital environmental management, Poland's inter-municipal cooperation structures, and Georgia's community-led sustainable tourism initiatives is examined, alongside adaptation pathways for Ukraine's institutional realities. The influence of digital transformation, climate volatility, and wartime disruptions on reshaping municipal environmental strategy portfolios is analyzed. Considerable attention is devoted to embedding ecological constraints – emissions accounting, ecosystem service preservation, soil regeneration, and closed-loop material flows – into local foresight methodologies. It is argued that the European Green Deal and associated regulatory instruments function not merely as compliance barriers but as fundamental catalysts for marketing-oriented ecological modernization at the community level. Systematic omission of these ecological parameters from strategic planning scenarios generates persistent overestimation of Ukrainian communities' fiscal and operational readiness for EU alignment. The correlation between an administrative unit's stakeholder engagement maturity and the predictive accuracy of its environmental planning is empirically grounded. A diagnostic toolkit for evaluating a territorial community's preparedness to adopt integrated green governance, based on institutional, financial, social, and informational indicators, is developed. Prospective trajectories for advancing participatory environmental governance in Ukraine's agricultural and peri-urban communities under conditions of wartime disruption and accelerated European accession are delineated.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://ros.edu.pl/images/roczniki/2026/047_ROS_V28_R2026.pdffirst seen 2026-09-24 05:16:29 · last seen 2026-09-29 05:33:53
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。