1.5℃移行における企業の役割:ステークホルダー参加型シナリオ分析
Business roles in 1.5 °C transitions: a stakeholder-informed scenario analysis (原題)
Kārlis Lakševics, Oksana Mont, Andrius Plepys, Jessika Richter, Jānis Brizga
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、1.5℃整合的な未来に向けた企業関連気候政策を、ステークホルダー評価に基づき検討する。文献レビュー、多国間Policy Delphi、シナリオ分析を組み合わせ、国家介入対自発性、ローカル対グローバルの2軸で4つのガバナンスシナリオを構築。国家主導・グローバル調整型は有効だが政治的に困難、自発的・分散型は実現可能だが不十分と評価され、規制・市場インセンティブ・参加型手法を組み合わせたハイブリッド型が支持された。
English
This paper examines business-related climate policies for 1.5°C-aligned futures through stakeholder assessments. Using a literature review, a multi-country Policy Delphi (Germany, Spain, Hungary, Latvia, Sweden), and scenario analysis, it builds four governance scenarios along state intervention vs. voluntarism and local vs. global axes. State-led and globally coordinated approaches were seen as effective but politically hard; voluntary/decentralized ones as feasible but insufficient. Stakeholders favored hybrid governance combining regulation, market incentives, and participation.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本企業がSSBJ・有報での気候開示と移行計画を進める上で、規制・市場・参加型のハイブリッド型ガバナンスが有効との示唆は、政策と企業実務の接点を考える材料になる。EU諸国のステークホルダー評価は、日本の政策設計や投資家対話の参考となる。
In the global GX context
Amid ISSB/CSRD and transition-plan expectations, this study shows stakeholders favor hybrid governance blending regulation, market incentives, and participation—relevant to how disclosure and transition planning interact with policy credibility. Its multi-country EU evidence adds to global debates on the institutional conditions for credible corporate climate action.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:企業を政策・制度に形作られるガバナンス主体として捉えるシナリオ手法の枠組みを提供する。
🏢実務担当者:規制・市場インセンティブ・参加型手法の組み合わせが企業関与の鍵となる点を、移行計画や政策エンゲージメント設計に活用できる。
🏛政策担当者:国家主導・グローバル調整型の有効性と政治的困難、ハイブリッド型の支持を踏まえ、政策の実現可能性と整合性設計を検討すべき。
📄 Abstract(原文)
Limiting global warming to 1.5 °C requires profound transformations of production and consumption systems, yet the role of businesses in enabling such transitions remains insufficiently addressed in scenario-based sustainability research. Existing scenarios often conceptualize firms as implementers of mitigation measures rather than governance actors shaped by policy, institutions, and societal expectations. This article addresses this gap by examining stakeholder assessments of business-related climate policies across alternative governance configurations for 1.5 °C-aligned futures. The study employs a three-stage methodology combining a literature review, a multi-country Policy Delphi, and a scenario analysis. The literature review identified conceptual gaps and informed the analytical framework. The Policy Delphi elicited expert assessments of the desirability, feasibility, barriers, and enabling conditions of business-related climate policies in Germany, Spain, Hungary, Latvia, and Sweden. We synthesize these insights into four exploratory governance scenarios structured along two dimensions: state intervention versus voluntarism, and local versus global governance. The results reveal substantial variation across governance configurations and national contexts. Stakeholders in the study widely perceived state-led and globally coordinated approaches as effective but politically and institutionally challenging, while more voluntary or decentralized approaches were seen as politically feasible but insufficient to achieve systemic change. Across scenarios, financial arrangements, institutional credibility, and policy coherence emerge as critical enablers of business engagement. Stakeholders consistently favor hybrid governance arrangements that combine regulation, market incentives, and participatory approaches. By integrating stakeholder-informed assessments of feasibility and desirability into scenario development, the article advances scenario-based transition research and provides a governance framework for evaluating business roles in 1.5 °C-aligned sustainability transitions.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.33980642first seen 2026-10-10 05:02:05
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。