← 論文一覧に戻る

Clean Technology Assessment of Green and Grey Hydrogen Pathways: Energy–Exergy Benchmarking Against Natural Gas Power Generation

グリーンおよびグレー水素経路のクリーンテクノロジー評価:天然ガス発電に対するエネルギー・エクセルギー比較 (AI 翻訳)

Z. Utlu, B. S. Önal

Clean Technology📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-08-01#水素経営インパクト: コスト削減対象セクター: power
DOI: 10.3390/cleantechnol8040118
原典: https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol8040118
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本研究は、1MWの正味電力を基準に、天然ガス燃焼、グレー水素燃焼・燃料電池、グリーン水素燃焼・燃料電池の各経路をエネルギー・エクセルギー分析で比較した。燃料電池は燃焼より効率が高く、グリーン水素はCO2排出がほぼゼロだが、グレー水素は上流排出が大きい。水素利用だけでは脱炭素にならず、製造方法と変換技術の両方が重要と結論。

English

This study compares natural gas combustion, grey hydrogen combustion/fuel cell, and green hydrogen combustion/fuel cell pathways under a 1 MW net output using energy and exergy analysis. Fuel cells show higher efficiency than combustion, and green hydrogen has near-zero CO2 emissions, while grey hydrogen has significant upstream emissions. The authors conclude that hydrogen use alone does not guarantee decarbonization; both production route and conversion technology matter.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本は水素基本戦略を掲げ、グリーン水素の導入拡大を目指している。本研究成果は、水素発電の効率とCO2排出のトレードオフを定量的に示し、日本の水素サプライチェーン設計や技術選択に示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

Globally, hydrogen is a key decarbonization vector, but its climate benefits depend on production and conversion. This study provides a thermodynamic benchmark that can inform international hydrogen strategies and technology roadmaps, especially for power generation and industrial applications.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a rigorous energy-exergy comparison of hydrogen pathways, useful for system design and optimization.

🏢実務担当者:Offers quantitative insights for selecting hydrogen technologies in power generation projects.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for policies that promote green hydrogen and efficient conversion technologies.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Hydrogen-based technologies are widely considered promising pathways for decarbonizing power generation and industrial energy systems; however, their overall sustainability depends strongly on both production routes and conversion efficiencies. This study presents a comparative energy and exergy analysis of hydrogen-based decarbonization pathways under a consistent 1 MW net electrical output boundary, including natural gas combustion (S0), grey hydrogen combustion (S1), grey hydrogen fuel cell (S2), green hydrogen combustion (S3), and green hydrogen fuel cell (S4) systems. The results indicate that combustion-based pathways (S0, S1, and S3) exhibit relatively low energy efficiencies of approximately 30–40% and exergy efficiencies of 25–40%, accompanied by high exergy destruction levels generally exceeding 60%. In contrast, fuel cell-based configurations (S2 and S4) demonstrate improved conversion-stage thermodynamic performance, achieving energy efficiencies of 50–60% and exergy efficiencies of 45–65%, while reducing exergy destruction due to electrochemical conversion and lower irreversibilities. A detailed comparison shows that the natural gas reference system reaches an exergy efficiency of 33.7%, whereas the hydrogen fuel cell system achieves 46.5%, corresponding to approximately 42% lower exergy destruction and about 36% reduced fuel input. From an environmental perspective, the simplified carbon assessment indicates that natural gas combustion generates approximately 577 kg CO2/h. Grey hydrogen pathways remain associated with substantial upstream emissions, generating approximately 857 kg CO2/h for grey hydrogen combustion and 545 kg CO2/h for grey hydrogen fuel cell operation under the 1 MW net electrical output basis. In contrast, green hydrogen-based pathways are assumed to have near-zero direct/upstream operational CO2 emissions under renewable-powered production assumptions. Overall, the findings show that hydrogen use alone does not guarantee decarbonization; rather, both the hydrogen production route and the final conversion technology must be considered to achieve thermodynamically efficient and low-carbon power generation.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。