← 論文一覧に戻る

建築改修パスポートのためのデジタル相互運用性：持続可能な建築改修と脱炭素化の支援

Digital Interoperability for Building Renovation Passports: Supporting Sustainable Building Renovation and Decarbonisation (原題)

Gabriela Barbosa, Manuela Almeida

Sustainability📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-09-21#省エネOrigin: EU対象セクター: real_estate
DOI: 10.3390/su18189652
原典: https://doi.org/10.3390/su18189652

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

EUの建築改修パスポート（BRP）とEPC・DBL・BIM・GIS・デジタルツイン・LCA等の相互運用性をPRISMA 2020に沿ってレビュー。651件から49研究と19のEUプロジェクトを精査し、BRP–EPC–DBL連携が最も成熟している一方、GIS・BIM・LCA等は3分の1未満でしか扱われていないことを示す。IFCやCityGML等の標準の不均衡と、BIM–LCA–BRP連携の実験段階性を指摘し、EPBDやRenovation Waveに向けた標準・意味論・ガバナンスの必要性を論じる。

English

A PRISMA 2020 review of Building Renovation Passport (BRP) interoperability with EPCs, DBLs, BIM, GIS, Digital Twins, and LCA tools, screening 651 records to 49 studies plus 19 EU projects. BRP–EPC–DBL is the most consolidated pattern, while GIS, BIM, IoT, SRI, LCA, and Digital Twins appear in under a third of initiatives. Data standards (IFC, CityGML, ETIM, ISO 22057) show uneven gaps, and the BIM–LCA–BRP link remains experimental, highlighting needs for standards, semantic consistency, and governance under the EPBD and Renovation Wave.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本では建築物省エネ法やCASBEE、ZEB化、住宅・建築物の長期修繕計画が議論されるが、改修履歴をデジタルで継続管理するBRP的な枠組みは未整備。EUの相互運用性設計は、日本版ログブックや非住宅の脱炭素改修支援、ESG不動産評価への示唆が大きい。

In the global GX context

This review directly informs the EU's EPBD and Renovation Wave implementation, where BRPs and Digital Building Logbooks are becoming disclosure and planning infrastructure. It adds to global scholarship on building-level data interoperability, a prerequisite for credible whole-life carbon accounting and transition finance in real estate.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:建築ストックの脱炭素化とデジタルデータ標準の接続に関する研究課題を整理するのに有用。

🏢実務担当者:改修計画・EPC・LCAデータの連携設計や、EU規制対応のデータ基盤整備の参考になる。

🏛政策担当者:建築改修パスポートやログブック制度設計における標準化・ガバナンスの必要性を示す。

📄 Abstract（原文）

Building Renovation Passports (BRPs) are increasingly recognised in the European Union (EU) as strategic instruments for planning and monitoring deep renovation. Yet, their effectiveness depends on interoperability with the wider ecosystem of digital tools used across the building lifecycle. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, this review searched ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Google Scholar for peer-reviewed studies (2020–2026) on BRP interoperability with Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs), Digital Building Logbooks (DBLs), Building Information Modelling (BIM), Geographic Information Systems (GIS), Digital Twins (DTs), and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) tools, screening 651 records to a final sample of 49 studies, complemented by a comparative analysis of 19 EU-funded projects and schemes. Results show that BRP–EPC–DBL co-occurrence is the most consolidated pattern across the initiatives reviewed. In contrast, GIS, BIM, IoT, Smart Readiness Indicator, LCA, and Digital Twin components are each explicitly addressed in fewer than a third of the initiatives reviewed. Mapping data standards (IFC, CityGML, ETIM, ISO 22057) show an uneven gap: shallower for BIM and LCA, where standards exist, and deeper for EPCs and DBLs, which lack unified EU schemas, and for GIS, where semantic and scale alignment with building-level BRP data remains weak. The BIM–LCA–BRP link, though feasible, remains experimental, rarely reconciling predicted and monitored carbon or linking BIM quantities to Environmental Product Declarations in machine-readable form. Closing these gaps requires technical standards, semantic consistency, and governance mechanisms capable of sustaining continuous data exchange, positioning interoperability as a priority for the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD, the EU legislative framework for improving building energy performance), the Renovation Wave (the EU strategy for accelerating and scaling up building renovation), and future digital building initiatives.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。