炭素中立達成に向けた自治体間連携モデルの類型化と政策提言
Typology of Interlocal Cooperation Models for Achieving Carbon Neutrality and Policy Recommendations (原題)
HR Jung, Park Soohyung, Wontae Lee
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
自治体が炭素中立を達成するには単独では限界があり、自治体間連携が政策実施能力を高める鍵となる。本研究は国内外の連携事例を分析し、都市集中型・産業発電特化型・混合型の3類型に地域を分類した。信頼に基づくガバナンス、安定的財源、技術共有、市民参加、継続的モニタリングを成功要因として挙げ、制度・財政基盤の強化と中央・民間とのネットワーク拡大を提言する。
English
Local governments cannot reach carbon neutrality alone; interlocal cooperation boosts implementation capacity. Analyzing domestic and international cases, the study classifies regions into urban-concentrated, industrial/power-specialized, and mixed types. Success factors include trust-based governance, stable finance, technology sharing, citizen participation, and continuous monitoring, with recommendations to strengthen institutional and financial foundations and expand central-government and private-sector networks.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では地域脱炭素・脱炭素先行地域や自治体間広域連携が政策課題となっており、類型化と成功要因は地方自治体のGX計画立案やSSBJ対応を見据えた地域データ整備の参考になる。
In the global GX context
As global climate governance increasingly emphasizes subnational action and multi-level coordination, this typology offers a framework for structuring interlocal cooperation and monitoring, relevant to jurisdictions implementing national decarbonization targets.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:自治体間連携の類型論と成功要因を整理した枠組みとして、地域気候ガバナンス研究の比較分析に活用できる。
🏢実務担当者:自治体・地域事業者が広域連携や官民連携を設計する際の成功要因チェックリストとして使える。
🏛政策担当者:中央・地方の政策連携、安定的財源、モニタリング制度の設計に資する政策示唆を提供する。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Local governments play a crucial role in responding to the climate crisis and achieving carbon neutrality. Effective attainment of regional carbon reduction targets necessitates intergovernmental collaboration, as it enhances policy implementation capacity. This study aims to analyze domestic and international cases of interlocal government cooperation, classify cooperation models, and propose strategies to enhance the effectiveness of carbon neutrality policies. The findings indicate that domestic intergovernmental cooperation focuses on expanding renewable energy, coordinating policies at a regional level, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions in industrial and transportation sectors. Key factors for sustaining and enhancing cooperation include strengthening policy linkages between central and local governments, establishing stable financial support systems, and implementing policy monitoring and evaluation mechanisms. In contrast, international cases highlight strategies such as smart city development, the formation of transnational climate governance, large-scale renewable energy projects, and public-private partnerships. Additionally, data-driven policy evaluation and active citizen-business collaboration have been emphasized to enhance policy effectiveness. This study classifies local governments into three regional characteristic types—urban-concentrated, industrial and power generation-specialized, and mixed types—based on their carbon emission characteristics and industrial structures. Furthermore, critical success factors for cooperation include establishing trust-based governance, ensuring structural flexibility, promoting technology sharing and innovation diffusion, securing stable financial resources, fostering citizen participation and community engagement, and implementing continuous policy monitoring and improvement mechanisms. Intergovernmental cooperation is an essential mechanism for addressing the limitations of independent local government-led carbon neutrality initiatives and strengthening policy implementation capacity. To build a sustainable carbon neutrality governance system, it is necessary to reinforce the institutional and financial foundation for interlocal cooperation, expand networks with central governments and private sectors, and introduce real-time policy evaluation and monitoring systems. This study contributes to enhancing the effectiveness of carbon neutrality policies through strengthened local government cooperation and offers key policy implications for future climate governance and decision-making processes.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.4491/ksee.2026.48.10.394first seen 2026-11-12 04:52:27 · last seen 2026-11-14 04:58:55
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。