スウェーデンのパリ協定路線設定：森林における気候緩和のための政策手段設計
Setting Sweden’s route to Paris: designing policy instruments for climate mitigation in forestry (原題)
Johanna Johansson, Jimmy Jönsson, Auvikki de Boon, Andreas Eriksson, Tomas Lundmark, Karin M. Ekström, L. Móller, Janina Priebe, Malin von Essen, Per‐Erik Wikberg, Camilla Sandström
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
スウェーデン森林の気候緩和貢献をめぐり、国家・市場・土地所有者の責任配分を変える3つの新規緩和シナリオを提示。27名のステークホルダー参加型ワークショップから、緩和責任・公正性・権力配分をめぐる課題を抽出した。部門横断・行政階層横断の政策統合と革新的政策手段の必要性を訴える。
English
This paper presents three novel mitigation scenarios for Swedish forestry that shift responsibility among state, market, and landowners. Drawing on two participatory workshops with 27 stakeholders, it identifies tensions over mitigation responsibility, justice claims, and power sharing. The authors call for stronger cross-sector policy integration and new instruments to implement forest-climate objectives under the Paris Agreement.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のGX文脈では、森林吸収源のカーボンクレジット（J-クレジット）やScope 3・SBTiの土地利用排出算定に関わる示唆がある。ただしスウェーデン固有の政策設計が中心で、日本の制度への直接適用は限定的。
In the global GX context
Forest-based mitigation is central to EU climate policy and to corporate land-use and removals accounting under CSRD/ISSB. The paper's focus on responsibility allocation and stakeholder acceptance informs how disclosure frameworks treat land-sector removals and nature-based credits.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:森林ガバナンスと緩和責任配分の社会科学的分析枠組みとして参照できる。
🏢実務担当者:土地利用・森林由来クレジットやScope 3排出算定の政策リスクを理解する材料になる。
🏛政策担当者:森林政策の部門横断統合と責任配分設計を検討する際の参加型手法の事例となる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Abstract The role of forest ecosystems in mitigating climate change has gained increasing prominence in international climate negotiations, particularly within the Paris Agreement and in the strategies and regulations of the European Union. This paper aims to enhance ongoing policy discussions on how Swedish forests can support climate mitigation goals by identifying which policy instruments, incentives, and climate strategies forest stakeholders prioritize, while advancing social science understandings of governance, stakeholder participation, and the socio-political conditions shaping forest management. Specifically, we examined the acceptance of, and perceived need for, alternative policy instruments designed to accelerate the climate transition through three novel mitigation scenarios for Swedish forestry. These scenarios explore the allocation of responsibility for achieving climate targets – whether it rests primarily with the state, the market, or individual landowners. Our findings draw on two participatory workshops involving 27 stakeholders and rightsholders engaged in Swedish forest management. The results reveal significant challenges in management and policy, particularly regarding responsibility for climate mitigation, justice claims, and power sharing. Furthermore, they underscore the need for stronger policy integration across sectors and administrative levels, as well as innovative policy instruments to facilitate the implementation of forest-climate objectives. We call on policy makers to reassess the current forest policy framework, extend policy instruments targeting climate mitigation, and support landowners who are prepared to contribute to the objectives outlined in the Paris Agreement.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-026-09743-yfirst seen 2026-11-13 04:57:04 · last seen 2026-11-14 04:45:55
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。