Policy governance failures and institutional asymmetries shaping Global North-South energy transitions
政策ガバナンスの失敗と制度的非対称性が形成するグローバル・ノースとサウスのエネルギー転換 (AI 翻訳)
Piyush Choudhary, Pratyush Yadav
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、グローバル・ノースとサウスのエネルギー転換における制度的・財政的・規制的非対称性を、インドを事例に系統的レビューで分析。VOSviewerとPRISMAを用いて7つのクラスターを特定し、ガバナンスの断片化、金融制度の弱さ、技術移転の制限が主な障壁であると結論付けている。
English
This systematic review examines institutional, financial, and regulatory asymmetries in Global North-South energy transitions, using India as a case. Using PRISMA and VOSviewer on literature from 2000-2025, it identifies seven themes. Findings show governance fragmentation, weak financial institutions, and limited technology transfer are key barriers, not resource scarcity. Seven policy conclusions are offered.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
インドを事例としたグローバル・サウスのエネルギー転換の障壁分析は、日本がアジア・新興国でのGX協力を検討する上で参考になる。特に、技術移転や資金メカニズムの課題は、日本の二国間クレジット制度やJCMにも示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This paper provides a systematic framework for understanding institutional barriers in Global South energy transitions, relevant for international cooperation and climate finance. Its findings on governance fragmentation and technology transfer gaps inform global efforts like the Just Transition framework and climate finance architecture.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Offers a systematic review framework and seven policy-relevant conclusions for energy transition governance research.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights key institutional barriers to energy transition in emerging economies, useful for project planning.
🏛政策担当者:Provides evidence that governance and financial institution strengthening, not just technology, are critical for just transitions.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This study is a policy-governance-oriented systematic review examining how institutional, financial, and regulatory asymmetries shape outcomes of the Global North-South energy transition. The case of India, an emerging economy with rapid growth in green energy, is explored to exemplify these gaps and differences. Key factors examined include energy affordability gaps, fossil fuel lock-ins, infrastructure deficiencies, technology access limitations, human resource gaps, and financial mechanisms. The PRISMA systematic framework, combined with the VOSviewer bibliometric method, is applied to comprehensive publication data, primarily from the Web of Science and Scopus (2000-2025). This study identifies seven cluster-based themes using VOSviewer. It examines seven scenarios: global energy transition, bioenergy, transitional fuels, blending, shipping fuels, innovation and policy, and green finance . The review reveals that research on policy finance interests is dominant, with significant gaps in research on technology transfer, affordability mechanisms, capacity building, and country-specific finance mechanisms. Findings further reveal that governance fragmentation, weak financial institutions, and limited technology transfer mechanisms, rather than resource scarcity, are the principal barriers to a just energy transition in the Global South. This study offers seven policy-relevant conclusions for governance practitioners and energy transition stakeholders.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2026.102294first seen 2026-06-25 04:33:27
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。