← 論文一覧に戻る

Reforming Investor–State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) Procedure for Energy Transition Disputes

エネルギー移行紛争のための投資家・国家間紛争解決（ISDS）手続きの改革 (AI 翻訳)

Fahira Brodlija

ジャーナル2026-07-21#政策Origin: Global
DOI: 10.4324/9781003536567-11
原典: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003536567-11

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本書の章は、気候変動対策としてのエネルギー移行に伴う投資家・国家間紛争解決（ISDS）の改革を論じる。ISDSがエネルギー移行政策の障害となる批判に対し、改革案を分析し、持続可能な開発のためのツールとして再定位する。国家レベルの改革とUNCITRAL WG IIIなどの国際的取り組みを検討し、ISDS廃止論から積極的活用論までを俯瞰する。

English

This chapter analyzes reforms to investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) in the context of energy transition, arguing that ISDS can be a tool for sustainable development rather than an obstacle. It reviews national and international reform efforts, including UNCITRAL WG III, and offers balanced solutions to address criticisms while preserving investor protections.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本では、エネルギー移行に伴う外国投資家との紛争リスクが高まる中、ISDS改革の議論は政策的示唆を持つ。特に、再生可能エネルギー導入や原発廃止などの政策が投資保護と衝突する可能性があり、日本の投資協定政策に参考になる。

In the global GX context

Globally, ISDS reform is critical for aligning investment treaties with climate goals. This chapter provides a balanced analysis of reform options, relevant for policymakers and scholars working on trade and climate policy integration.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:ISDS改革とエネルギー移行の交差を理解するための包括的なレビュー。

🏢実務担当者:エネルギー投資家は、政策変更時の紛争リスクと保護の可能性を把握できる。

🏛政策担当者:投資協定の設計と気候政策の整合性を検討する際の参考になる。

📄 Abstract（原文）

Chapter 9 is written by Fahira Brodlija and is titled ‘Reforming Investor–State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) Procedure for Energy Transition Disputes: From Obstacle to Tool for Sustainable Development.’ The author highlights that ISDS has been an ‘easy target’ for critics of the investment treaty landscape. This critique has exacerbated in times of urgent calls for energy transition to combat climate change and elevate environmental standards. The author rightly notes that the procedural critique goes to the very heart of the investment treaty system, namely, ‘questioning whether foreign investors should be able to challenge government measures for energy transition, and if so, what format and guardrails (if any) should they have in the future’. Against such background, this chapter analyzes and dissects a spectrum of proposed and implemented reforms, placing them in the energy transition context, and suggesting possible mechanisms for their effective use. The chapter eloquently moves between those suggestions advocating for termination of ISDS, to those advancing it as a premium feature of global energy and foreign direct investment (FDI) governance. In doing so, she focuses on reforms in individual States, as well as international joint efforts (primarily the UNCITRAL WG III). The author presents a balanced, informed, yet firm, voice against the anti-ISDS movement while offering workable reform solutions to redress current shortcomings of the system design.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。