← 論文一覧に戻る

発電コスト2025

The Costs of Generating Electricity 2025 (原題)

Nuclear Energy Agency

JCMSジャーナル2026-09-08#エネルギー転換Origin: Global経営インパクト: コスト削減対象セクター: power
DOI: 10.82155/gg37-nc83
原典: https://doi.org/10.82155/gg37-nc83

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

OECD/NEAとEPRIが21カ国・23技術の発電所レベルLCOEデータを提示。SMRや水素タービン、CCUS付き化石燃料も含む。長期運転原子力・水力・系統コスト除く陸上風力と太陽光のみが100USD/MWh未満。LCOEは重要だがシステムコスト分析の補完が必要と結論。

English

OECD/NEA and EPRI present plant-level LCOE data for 23 technologies across 21 countries, covering SMRs, hydrogen turbines, and fossil fuels with/without CCUS. Only nuclear LTO, hydro, and onshore wind/solar (excluding system costs) fall below USD 100/MWh. LCOE remains vital but must be complemented by country-specific system cost analysis.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本のGX電源政策・電源構成議論に直結。原子力長期運転や再エネ導入判断、系統コスト評価の基礎資料として、経産省・電力会社・投資家の意思決定に有用。

In the global GX context

Provides global benchmark LCOE data relevant to ISSB/TCFD transition planning and decarbonization investment decisions. Highlights the need for system-level cost analysis, informing policy and corporate energy strategies worldwide.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:発電技術のコスト比較とシステムコスト統合の必要性を定量的に示す基礎データ。

🏢実務担当者:電源調達や脱炭素投資判断の際、LCOEと系統コストを併せて評価する重要性を再確認できる。

🏛政策担当者:電源構成政策やエネルギー安全保障の議論で、技術別コストとシステムコストの両面を考慮する根拠となる。

📄 Abstract(原文)

In a fast-changing energy landscape, confronted by rising demand, price volatility and increasing capital intensity, providing reliable data on the costs of generating electricity to policymakers, experts and modellers is essential. Combining the deep techno-economic expertise of the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) and the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), The Costs of Generating Electricity 2025 provides plant-level data on the levelised costs of electricity (LCOE) for 23 technologies in 21 countries. It includes data on a broad range of low carbon technologies, including small modular reactors (SMRs) and hydrogen turbines, as well as a number of fossil-fuel based technologies, both with and without carbon capture and storage (CCUS). Based on this data, it seems electricity systems are becoming increasingly low carbon and more diversified, but also more expensive. Only the long-term operation (LTO) of existing nuclear power plants, hydroelectricity, and – as long as their system costs are excluded – onshore wind and solar photovoltaic (PV) can provide electricity for less than USD 100 per MWh. While LCOE remains a vital building block of the information infrastructure on electricity systems, the data on costs and capacity factors also signal that they need to be complemented by system cost analysis in a specific country context to provide a reliable guide for decision making.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。