← 論文一覧に戻る

21世紀のための再生型・システム的持続可能性:倫理・運用・ガバナンスの統合

Sostenibilidad Regenerativa y Sistémica para el Siglo XXI: Integración Ética, Operativa y de Gobernanza (原題)

Francisco Ramírez Moreno

Ibero Ciencias - Revista Científica y Académica - ISSN 3072-7197📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-09-19#ESG対象セクター: cross_sector
DOI: 10.63371/ic.v5.n3.a1619
原典: https://revistaiberociencias.org/index.php/multidisciplinar/article/download/1619/4250
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は持続可能性を、生態・社会・経済・ガバナンスの相互作用を意識的に管理する変革的・倫理的・再生的実践として再定義する。SDGs、パリ協定、GRI、ESG、ISO26000、SASB、TCFD等の国際枠組みと比較し、RADAR4評価モデルで運用指標を統合。企業・政府・大学・NGOに適用可能な測定・適応性を備えた枠組みを提示する。

English

This article redefines sustainability as a transformative, ethical, and regenerative praxis managing interactions among ecological, social, economic, and governance systems. It compares the proposal with SDGs, Paris Agreement, GRI, ESG, ISO 26000, SASB, and TCFD, using the RADAR4 model to operationalize measurable indicators across firms, governments, universities, and NGOs.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

SSBJ基準や統合報告書が求めるESG情報の概念基盤を再考する材料となる。ただし日本固有の制度・事例には触れておらず、国内実務への直接的示唆は限定的。

In the global GX context

Offers a conceptual reframing of sustainability that intersects with TCFD, GRI, SASB, and ISSB-era disclosure debates, though it remains a normative proposal rather than empirical evidence. Useful for scholars questioning the theoretical foundations of ESG reporting frameworks.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:ESG・持続可能性概念の理論的系譜と枠組み比較を整理する参照点として有用。

🏢実務担当者:RADAR4モデルを自社のサステナビリティ評価指標設計の参考にできる可能性がある。

🏛政策担当者:政策・企業戦略・コミュニティ行動の収斂を図る概念的枠組みとして参考になる。

📄 Abstract(原文)

The objective of this article is to present a redefinition of the concept of sustainability. From this perspective, sustainability is conceived as a transformative, systemic, ethical, and regenerative praxis aimed at ensuring the dignified, just, and harmonious continuity of life on the planet through the conscious and shared management of interactions among ecological, social, economic, and governance systems. The proposal arises in response to the conceptual and operational limitations of previous definitions, as well as the need for a framework that rigorously links theory and practice within contemporary contexts of high complexity. The proposal was developed through an exhaustive and comparative documentary analysis, enriched by criteria of conceptual triangulation and expert validation. The definition was contrasted with consolidated international frameworks such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the Paris Agreement, the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) principles, the ISO 26000 International Standard on Social Responsibility, the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), and the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) created by the Financial Stability Board. The RADAR4 sustainability assessment model, used as an integrative reference, enabled the articulation of operational and strategic indicators that provide the proposed definition with applicability, measurability, and adaptability across different scales and sectors, including companies, government entities, universities, and non-governmental organizations. The results show that the proposal overcomes historical limitations by incorporating verifiable metrics, traceability criteria, and a flexible approach that facilitates convergence among public policies, corporate strategies, and community action. Altogether, the redefinition constitutes a theoretical, scientific, and operational contribution of high value, with the potential to become an academic and normative reference, strengthening the integration between theory, policy, and practice in the global sustainability agenda. The article is structured in five parts. The first is this introduction, which presents the central problem: redefining the concept of sustainability in the face of current challenges. The second part, the theoretical framework, reviews the historical evolution of the concept, the main academic debates, and existing conceptual gaps. The third part refers to the methodology, explaining the hermeneutic-constructivist approach and the analytical criteria used. In the fourth part, results and discussion, the new conceptual proposal of sustainability is presented and compared with international frameworks. Finally, the fifth part, devoted to conclusions, synthesizes the theoretical and practical contributions of the proposal, highlighting its applicability and future research pathways.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。