気候変動の文脈における森林法制の評価：専門家・実務者視点からのトルコ森林法の事例
Assessing Forest Legislation in the Context of Climate Change Through Expert and Practitioner Perspectives: The Case of the Turkish Forest Law (原題)
Atakan Osman Demircan, Nilay Tulukcu Yıldızbaş
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究はトルコ森林法を気候変動の緩和・適応の観点から評価した。法律分析・AHP・実務者65名への調査を組み合わせ、7基準で条文群を採点。保全志向の規定は許可・配分志向より高評価で、緩和寄与が適応より高く評価された。炭素・気候に関する明示的文言の欠如と許可規定が主な課題と指摘する。
English
This study evaluates Türkiye's forest law for climate mitigation and adaptation performance, combining legal analysis, AHP weighting, and a survey of 65 forestry practitioners across seven criteria. Conservation-oriented provisions scored significantly higher than permit- and allocation-oriented ones, and mitigation was rated above adaptation. Key gaps include permit provisions and the absence of explicit carbon/climate language.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では森林吸収源が地球温暖化対策計画やJ-クレジット制度の柱であり、森林関連法制度の気候性能を実務者視点で定量評価する手法は、国内の森林政策・吸収源会計の議論に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
As land-use and forestry sink accounting gains weight under ISSB and national net-zero plans, this paper offers a replicable method (AHP + practitioner scoring) for auditing whether forest legislation actually delivers mitigation and adaptation—useful for jurisdictions revising land-use frameworks.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:法制度の気候性能をAHPと実務者調査で定量化する評価手法の一事例として参照できる。
🏢実務担当者:森林・土地利用に関わる企業は、規制が炭素吸収や適応をどこまで担保するか把握する材料になる。
🏛政策担当者:森林法改正時に、炭素・気候文言の明示と許可規定の見直しが有効であることを示す。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Forest law shapes protection, carbon sequestration, and adaptation. However, empirical and field-based evaluation of the mitigation and adaptation performance of forest legislation in combating climate change remains limited. This study combines legal analysis, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and field data to assess Türkiye’s forest law under seven criteria. The criteria were derived from five sources, validated by nine experts, and weighted through AHP. The perceived climate-related performance was assessed using a five-point Likert scale administered to 65 forestry practitioners for each article group. The Weighted Climate Score (WCS) was calculated as the product of dimension weights and item scores. Practitioners rated the overall contribution of the evaluated provisions significantly above the scale midpoint (WCS = 3.33/5). Conservation-oriented provisions received significantly higher scores than permit- and allocation-oriented provisions, and practitioners rated the mitigation contribution higher than the adaptation contribution. The main gaps were permit and allocation provisions and the absence of explicit carbon/climate language.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/su182110869first seen 2026-11-15 04:53:03
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。