環境品質のための資金動員：サブサハラ・アフリカにおける再生可能エネルギー金融、公的資金、外部資金流入が温室効果ガス排出に与える影響
MOBILIZING FINANCE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY: IMPACTS OF RENEWABLE ENERGY FINANCING, PUBLIC FINANCE, AND EXTERNAL INFLOWS ON GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA (原題)
Marcus Samuel Nnamdi, Nwosu Chinedu Anthony, CHARLES A. AGUWAMBA, Sandralyn Ifeoma Obiukwu
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
サブサハラ・アフリカを対象に、グリーンファイナンス・公的資金・ODA・送金が環境品質に与える影響を2014〜2023年のデータで分析。MMQRにより国を排出水準別に分類した結果、グリーン金融と公的資金は中・高排出国で炭素集約度を有意に高め、低排出国では効果が不明瞭。ODAは環境改善に寄与する一方、送金は逆効果であることが示された。
English
Using 2014–2023 data and Method of Moments Quantile Regression, this study examines how green finance, public finance, ODA, and remittances affect environmental quality in Sub-Saharan Africa. Green and public finance significantly raise carbon intensity in medium- and high-emitting countries but not in low emitters. ODA supports environmental quality, while remittances hinder it, prompting calls to channel inflows into green technology and R&D.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のGX文脈とは直接の接点は薄いが、途上国向けトランジションファイナンスやODAを通じた国際協力の設計を考える上で、資金流入が必ずしも排出削減に直結しないという実証的警告は、日本の政府開発援助・気候資金戦略にとって示唆がある。
In the global GX context
This paper adds to the global transition finance debate by showing that green and public finance inflows do not automatically reduce emissions in developing economies, challenging assumptions behind blended finance and climate aid. It offers evidence relevant to ISSB/TCFD-aligned capital allocation discussions in emerging markets.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:MMQRを用いた資金流入と排出量の非線形関係の実証例として、途上国気候金融研究に有用。
🏢実務担当者:新興国でのグリーン投資・ODA案件の設計時に、資金投入が排出削減に直結しないリスクを考慮する材料となる。
🏛政策担当者:ODAや送金の使途をグリーン技術・R&Dに誘導する政策設計の必要性を示唆。
📄 Abstract（原文）
The United Nations 2030 target for clean and affordable energy, intended to promote environmental sustainability, has triggered scholars and policymakers towards examining the drivers of a clean environment and the readiness of developing countries to achieve this goal. This study investigates the effect of green finance and public finance on environmental quality in Sub-Saharan Africa. This area remains underexplored energy literature. Green finance is measured as international financial flow for clean and renewable energy, public finance is measured by general government consumption as a percentage of GDP. The study also examines the effect of ODA and remittances. Utilizing dataset from 2014 to 2023, the study applied Method of Moments Quantile Regression to classify the countries according to their emission levels. The results show that green financing and public finance exert a statistically significant positive effect on carbon emission intensity in medium- and high-emitting countries, while their effects are insignificant in low-emitting countries. Remittances also hinder green environment, while ODA significantly support green environment. The study recommends increased ODA inflows and investment of green finance, public finance, and remittances in green technologies, environmental research and development, and policy implementations to turn the inflows into drivers of sustainable environmental improvement.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.70382/caijarss.v12i2.064first seen 2026-10-03 04:47:39
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。